首页> 外文期刊>Family practice. >Empirical treatment followed by a test-and-treat strategy is more cost-effective in comparison with prompt endoscopy or radiography in patients with dyspeptic symptoms: a randomized trial in a primary care setting.
【24h】

Empirical treatment followed by a test-and-treat strategy is more cost-effective in comparison with prompt endoscopy or radiography in patients with dyspeptic symptoms: a randomized trial in a primary care setting.

机译:与消化不良症状患者的及时内镜检查或X线摄影相比,经验疗法加试验和治疗策略更具成本效益:这是在基层医疗机构中进行的一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Management of patients with dyspepsia remains controversial. No consensus has yet been reached concerning diagnostic and medical strategies. We conducted a randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of three management strategies for patients with uninvestigated persistent dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: A total of 199 patients presenting in primary care with dyspeptic symptoms (age 18-65 years, no alarming symptoms) were randomized to either empirical treatment with omeprazole and, in the case of symptomatic relapse, serological Helicobacter pylori infection testing plus eradication therapy (treat-and-test group), prompt upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (endoscopy group) or prompt upper gastrointestinal radiography (radiography group) followed by directed medical treatment. Symptoms, patients' satisfaction and use of resources were recorded during 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were assigned to the treat-and-test group, 64 to the radiography group and 66 to the endoscopygroup. The median age was 44 years; 104 patients were male and 37% were H.pylori infected. A total of 170 patients (85%) returned the 6 months questionnaire. The numbers of patients with complete symptom relief in the treat-and-test group, endoscopy group and radiography group were 21, 16 and 15, respectively, at 3 months (P = 0.59), and 23, 13 and 12, respectively, at 6 months (P = 0.05). Twenty-two patients in the treat-and-test group underwent endoscopy or radiography. Two patients in the endoscopy group and four patients in the radiography group underwent more than one diagnostic test. The average medical cost per patient for the treat-and-test group was euro 276, for the endoscopy group euro 426 and for the radiography group euro 321, respectively. CONCLUSION: Empirical treatment followed by a test-and-eradicate strategy resulted in fewer diagnostic tests, more symptom relief and lower medical costs compared with prompt upper gastrointestinal radiography or endoscopy in the management of uninvestigated patients with persistent dyspeptic symptoms.
机译:目的:消化不良患者的治疗仍存在争议。关于诊断和医学策略尚未达成共识。我们进行了一项随机试验,以评估三种管理策略对未经调查的持续性消化不良症状患者的有效性。方法:将共有199名出现消化不良症状(年龄在18-65岁,无惊人症状)的初级保健患者随机分配到奥美拉唑的经验性治疗中,如果出现症状复发,则进行血清学幽门螺杆菌感染检测加根除治疗(治疗组),及时上消化道内镜检查(内窥镜检查组)或及时上消化道X线检查(放射线检查组),然后进行直接医疗。在随访的6个月中记录症状,患者满意度和资源使用情况。结果:69例患者被分为治疗和测试组,64例为放射线照相组,66例为内窥镜检查组。中位年龄是44岁。男性104例,幽门螺杆菌感染37%。共有170位患者(85%)返回了6个月的问卷。治疗和测试组,内窥镜检查组和影像学检查组在3个月时症状完全缓解的患者分别为21、16和15(P = 0.59),而在3个月时分别为23、13和12。 6个月(P = 0.05)。治疗和测试组中的22例患者接受了内窥镜检查或X线摄影。内窥镜检查组的两名患者和放射照相检查组的四名患者接受了一项以上的诊断测试。治疗和测试组每位患者的平均医疗费用分别为276欧元,内窥镜组426欧元和放射线照相组321欧元。结论:在未调查的持续性消化不良症状患者中,与迅速的上消化道X线摄片或内窥镜检查相比,经验疗法加上根除策略可以减少诊断检查,减轻症状并降低医疗成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号