...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Comparing concentration-based (AOT40) and stomatal uptake (PODY) metrics for ozone risk assessment to European forests
【24h】

Comparing concentration-based (AOT40) and stomatal uptake (PODY) metrics for ozone risk assessment to European forests

机译:比较基于浓度(AOT40)和气孔吸收(PODY)的指标来评估欧洲森林的臭氧风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Tropospheric ozone (O-3) produces harmful effects to forests and crops, leading to a reduction of land carbon assimilation that, consequently, influences the land sink and the crop yield production. To assess the potential negative O-3 impacts to vegetation, the European Union uses the Accumulated Ozone over Threshold of 40ppb (AOT40). This index has been chosen for its simplicity and flexibility in handling different ecosystems as well as for its linear relationships with yield or biomass loss. However, AOT40 does not give any information on the physiological O-3 uptake into the leaves since it does not include any environmental constraints to O-3 uptake through stomata. Therefore, an index based on stomatal O-3 uptake (i.e. PODY), which describes the amount of O-3 entering into the leaves, would be more appropriate. Specifically, the PODY metric considers the effects of multiple climatic factors, vegetation characteristics and local and phenological inputs rather than the only atmospheric O-3 concentration. For this reason, the use of PODY in the O-3 risk assessment for vegetation is becoming recommended. We compare different potential O-3 risk assessments based on two methodologies (i.e. AOT40 and stomatal O-3 uptake) using a framework of mesoscale models that produces hourly meteorological and O-3 data at high spatial resolution (12km) over Europe for the time period 2000-2005. Results indicate a remarkable spatial and temporal inconsistency between the two indices, suggesting that a new definition of European legislative standard is needed in the near future. Besides, our risk assessment based on AOT40 shows a good consistency compared to both in-situ data and other model-based datasets. Conversely, risk assessment based on stomatal O-3 uptake shows different spatial patterns compared to other model-based datasets. This strong inconsistency can be likely related to a different vegetation cover and its associated parameterizations.
机译:对流层臭氧(O-3)对森林和农作物产生有害影响,导致土地碳同化的减少,从而影响土地吸收和农作物的产量。为了评估O-3对植被的潜在负面影响,欧盟使用的累积臭氧阈值上限为40ppb(AOT40)。选择该指数的原因在于它在处理不同生态系统方面的简单性和灵活性,以及​​与产量或生物量损失之间的线性关系。但是,AOT40没有提供有关叶片中O-3的生理吸收的任何信息,因为它不包括通过气孔吸收O-3的任何环境限制。因此,基于气孔O-3吸收量的指数(即PODY)会更合适,该指数描述进入叶片的O-3量。具体来说,PODY指标考虑了多种气候因素,植被特征以及局部和物候输入的影响,而不是唯一的大气O-3浓度。因此,建议在PO-3的O-3植被风险评估中使用PODY。我们使用中尺度模型框架比较基于两种方法(即AOT40和气孔O-3吸收)的不同潜在O-3风险评估,该模型在欧洲范围内以高空间分辨率(12km)生成每小时的气象和O-3数据2000年至2005年。结果表明这两个指标之间存在明显的时空不一致,这表明在不久的将来需要对欧洲立法标准进行新的定义。此外,与现场数据和其他基于模型的数据集相比,我们基于AOT40的风险评估显示出良好的一致性。相反,与基于模型的其他数据集相比,基于气孔O-3吸收的风险评估显示出不同的空间格局。这种强烈的不一致很可能与不同的植被覆盖及其相关的参数设置有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号