Physiological advantages of C₄ grasses in the field: a comparative experiment demonstrating the importance of drought.

摘要

Global climate change is expected to shift regional rainfall patterns, influencing species distributions where they depend on water availability. Comparative studies have demonstrated that C₄ grasses inhabit drier habitats than C₃ relatives, but that both C₃ and C₄ photosynthesis are susceptible to drought. However, C₄ plants may show advantages in hydraulic performance in dry environments. We investigated the effects of seasonal variation in water availability on leaf physiology, using a common garden experiment in the Eastern Cape of South Africa to compare 12 locally occurring grass species from C₄ and C₃ sister lineages. Photosynthesis was always higher in the C₄ than C₃ grasses across every month, but the difference was not statistically significant during the wettest months. Surprisingly, stomatal conductance was typically lower in the C₃ than C₄ grasses, with the peak monthly average for C₃ species being similar to that of C₄ leaves. In water-limited, rain-fed plots, the photosynthesis of C₄ leaves was between 2.0 and 7.4 micro mol m-2 s-1 higher, stomatal conductance almost double, and transpiration 60% higher than for C₃ plants. Although C₄ average instantaneous water-use efficiencies were higher (2.4-8.1 mmol mol-1) than C₃ averages (0.7-6.8 mmol mol-1), differences were not as great as we expected and were statistically significant only as drought became established. Photosynthesis declined earlier during drought among C₃ than C₄ species, coincident with decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration. Eventual decreases in photosynthesis among C₄ plants were linked with declining midday leaf water potentials. However, during the same phase of drought, C₃ species showed significant decreases in hydrodynamic gradients that suggested hydraulic failure. Thus, our results indicate that stomatal and hydraulic behaviour during drought enhances the differences in photosynthesis between C₄ and C₃ species. We suggest that these drought responses are important for understanding the advantages of C₄ photosynthesis under field conditions.