...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis.

机译:秸秆碳输入对农业土壤碳动态的影响:荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Straw return has been widely recommended as an environmentally friendly practice to manage carbon (C) sequestration in agricultural ecosystems. However, the overall trend and magnitude of changes in soil C in response to straw return remain uncertain. In this meta-analysis, we calculated the response ratios of soil organic C (SOC) concentrations, greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission, nutrient contents and other important soil properties to straw addition in 176 published field studies. Our results indicated that straw return significantly increased SOC concentration by 12.8+or-0.4% on average, with a 27.4+or-1.4% to 56.6+or-1.8% increase in soil active C fraction. CO2 emission increased in both upland (27.8+or-2.0%) and paddy systems (51.0+or-2.0%), while CH4 emission increased by 110.7+or-1.2% only in rice paddies. N2O emission has declined by 15.2+or-1.1% in paddy soils but increased by 8.3+or-2.5% in upland soils. Responses of macro-aggregates and crop yield to straw return showed positively linear with increasing SOC concentration. Straw-C input rate and clay content significantly affected the response of SOC. A significant positive relationship was found between annual SOC sequestered and duration, suggesting that soil C saturation would occur after 12 years under straw return. Overall, straw return was an effective means to improve SOC accumulation, soil quality, and crop yield. Straw return-induced improvement of soil nutrient availability may favor crop growth, which can in turn increase ecosystem C input. Meanwhile, the analysis on net global warming potential (GWP) balance suggested that straw return increased C sink in upland soils but increased C source in paddy soils due to enhanced CH4 emission. Our meta-analysis suggested that future agro-ecosystem models and cropland management should differentiate the effects of straw return on ecosystem C budget in upland and paddy soils.
机译:广泛建议将秸秆还田作为一种环境友好做法,以管理农业生态系统中的碳(C)隔离。然而,响应秸秆还田的土壤碳变化的总体趋势和幅度仍然不确定。在这项荟萃分析中,我们在176个已发表的田间研究中计算了土壤有机碳(SOC)浓度,温室气体(GHGs)排放,养分含量和其他重要土壤特性对秸秆添加的响应比。我们的结果表明,秸秆还田使土壤有机碳浓度平均提高了12.8+或-0.4%,土壤活性碳含量增加了27.4+或-1.4%至56.6+或-1.8%。陆地系统和稻田系统中CO 2 的排放均增加(27.8+或-2.0%),稻田系统(51.0+或-2.0%)的CO 2 排放增加,而CH 4 的排放增加110.7+或-1.2%仅在稻田中。稻田土壤N 2 O排放量下降了15.2+或-1.1%,而旱地土壤中的N 2 O排放量增加了8.3+或-2.5%。大型集料和农作物产量对秸秆还田的反应与SOC浓度呈正线性关系。秸秆碳输入速率和粘土含量显着影响SOC的响应。发现每年的SOC封存与持续时间之间存在显着的正相关关系,这表明在秸秆还田下12年后土壤C饱和。总体而言,秸秆还田是提高土壤有机碳累积,土壤质量和农作物产量的有效手段。秸秆还田引起的土壤养分利用率的提高可能有利于作物生长,进而增加生态系统的碳投入。同时,对全球净变暖潜能(GWP)平衡的分析表明,秸秆还田增加了CH 4 的排放,增加了旱地土壤的碳库,但增加了稻田土壤的碳源。我们的荟萃分析表明,未来的农业生态系统模型和农田管理应区分秸秆还田对旱地和水稻土中生态系统碳收支的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号