首页> 外文期刊>Geophysics: Journal of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists >A comparative study of finite element and spectral element methods in seismic wavefield modeling
【24h】

A comparative study of finite element and spectral element methods in seismic wavefield modeling

机译:地震波场建模中有限元和谱元方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The computational accuracy and efficiency of finite element method and spectral element method (SEM) are investigated thoroughly in time-domain elastic wavefield modeling. The diagonal mass matrices of the FEM and SEM free from matrix inversion are compared comprehensively by making full use of the mass-lumped technique and quadrature rules.We investigate the FEM and SEM based, respectively, on quadrilateral with the polynomials of degrees one and two, and on triangular grids with the polynomials of degrees one and three. Generally, the numerical solutions based on quadrilateral grids have a higher precision than those computed on triangular grids when the same order of polynomials is used. The FEM has a comparable accuracy to the SEM with the same number of interpolant points. In view of the triangular and quadrilateral SEMs, the former suffers from larger computational costs and relatively lower accuracy compared with the latter. Furthermore, the convergence study proves that the triangular SEM produces consistently larger errors than the quadrilateral SEM for any order and element sizes. However, the triangular SEM can adapt to arbitrary complex geometries effectively. In terms of efficiency, the FEM has an efficiency comparable with the SEM on condition that the order of interpolation polynomials is identical. In addition, a perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition in variational form is deduced. By introducing four intermediate variables in frequency domain, the PML avoids convolution calculation and obtains an exact solution through inverse Fourier transform in time domain. The numerical examples verify the validity and effectiveness of the PML.
机译:在时域弹性波场建模中,深入研究了有限元法和谱元法(SEM)的计算精度和效率。充分利用质量集总技术和正交规则,对没有矩阵求逆的FEM和SEM的对角质量矩阵进行了全面比较。我们分别基于四边形与一阶和二阶多项式对FEM和SEM进行了研究。 ,并且在多项式分别为一和三的三角形网格上。通常,当使用相同阶次的多项式时,基于四边形网格的数值解的精度要高于基于三角形网格的数值解。在相同数量的内插点的情况下,FEM具有与SEM相当的精度。考虑到三角形和四边形SEM,与后者相比,前者具有较大的计算成本和相对较低的精度。此外,收敛性研究证明,对于任何阶数和元素尺寸,三角形SEM始终比四边形SEM产生更大的误差。但是,三角形SEM可以有效地适应任意复杂的几何形状。在效率方面,在插值多项式的阶数相同的情况下,FEM具有与SEM相当的效率。另外,推导了变形式的完美匹配层(PML)边界条件。通过在频域中引入四个中间变量,PML避免了卷积计算,并通过时域中的傅立叶逆变换获得了精确的解。数值例子验证了PML的有效性和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号