首页> 外文期刊>Geosystem Engineering >Integration of GIS and analytical hierarchy process method for locating road emergency medical services station
【24h】

Integration of GIS and analytical hierarchy process method for locating road emergency medical services station

机译:GIS与层次分析法相结合的道路应急医疗服务站选址

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article describes the application of a well-known multi-criteria decision-making technique called analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to locate emergency medical service (EMS) along US interstate highway I-65 from Montgomery to Birmingham, Alabama. Five weighting methods were applied, including Row Sum, Column Sum, Arithmetic Average, Geo-Mean, and Eigen Vector to determine weights of criteria. A number of experts were asked to evaluate the importance of selected criteria according to a nine-point scale (the Saaty rating scale). Afterwards, a weighted overlay method was applied to evaluate pixel adequacy and to identify areas with highest potential to establish the EMS along the road. After that all alternatives were ranked with the AHP method, and finally, sensitivity analysis of criteria weights was performed. The proposed method shows that locating EMS stations is very sensitive to Distance to City, Distance to Intersection, and Distance to Police Station criteria weights, and it should be considered in selecting experts and criteria weighting process.
机译:本文介绍了一种著名的多准则决策技术(称为层次分析法(AHP))在沿蒙哥马利至阿拉巴马州伯明翰市的美国I-65州际公路上定位紧急医疗服务(EMS)的应用。应用了五种加权方法,包括行总和,列总和,算术平均值,地理均值和特征向量,以确定标准的权重。要求许多专家根据九点量表(Saaty评分量表)评估所选标准的重要性。之后,采用加权叠加法评估像素是否足够,并确定最有可能在道路上建立EMS的区域。之后,使用AHP方法对所有备选方案进行排名,最后对标准权重进行敏感性分析。所提出的方法表明,定位EMS驻地对到城市的距离,到交叉口的距离以及到警察局的距离标准权重非常敏感,在选择专家和标准权重过程中应该考虑这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号