首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Journal >Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the London 2012 Olympics
【24h】

Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the London 2012 Olympics

机译:指挥,控制和对抗:在2012年伦敦奥运会上进行安全谈判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mega-event security is often characterised as an exceptional exercise in terms of scale, scope and form, and considered variously through macro-theoretical lenses citing the assertion of overarching disciplinary, neoliberal, colonial corporatist and other interest-based aspirations. Based on empirical analysis of the London 2012 Olympic security operation and of those who resisted it (including data drawn from interviews and participant observations with key security agencies and activists), this paper interrogates the complex, diverse and often fragmented contestations over space across the Olympic neighbourhood. Despite the professed unity of purpose among Olympic planners (such as the protection of sponsors' access to the marketplace), more detailed analysis reveals both the application and purpose of ordering processes as contested and sometimes contradictory realms. Here, the longstanding recognition that space is used in simultaneously diverse ways is reflected in its control. Drawing on Foucauldian notions of security different impositions of order - regulatory, exclusionary, disciplinary, suggestive and assuasive - are argued to exist simultaneously in the same broadly defined area.
机译:大型活动的安全性通常在规模,范围和形式上被描述为一项特殊的活动,并通过宏观理论从各种角度加以考虑,理由是纪律性,新自由主义,殖民主义和其他基于利益的愿望。基于对2012年伦敦奥运会安全行动及其抵制者的经验分析(包括从与主要安全机构和维权人士的访谈和参与者观察中得出的数据),本文探究了整个奥运期间对空间的复杂,多样且往往分散的竞赛邻里。尽管宣称奥林匹克规划者之间的目的是统一的(例如保护赞助商进入市场),但更详细的分析揭示了订购过程的应用性和目的是有争议的领域,有时是相互矛盾的领域。在这里,长期以来人们就认识到以多种方式同时使用空间的情况反映在空间的控制上。有人以福柯的安全性概念为依据,认为在同一广泛定义的区域中同时存在着不同的秩序规定,包括规制性,排他性,纪律性,暗示性和说服力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号