...
首页> 外文期刊>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: Official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) >Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures: a comparison with conventional radiography and computed tomography
【24h】

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures: a comparison with conventional radiography and computed tomography

机译:超声检查在鼻骨骨折中的诊断:与常规放射线照相和计算机断层扫描的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography (US) with radiography and multi-detector computed tomography (CT) for the detection of nasal bone fractures. Forty-one patients with a nasal bone fracture who underwent prospective US examinations were included. Plain radiographs and CT images were obtained on the day of trauma. For US examinations, radiologist used a linear array transducer (L17-5 MHz) in 24 patients and hockey-stick probe (L15-7 MHz) in 17. The bony component of the nose was divided into three parts (right and left lateral nasal walls, and midline of nasal bone). Fracture detection by three modalities was subjected to analysis. Furthermore, findings made by each modality were compared with intraoperative findings. Nasal bone fractures were located in the right lateral wall (n = 28), midline of nasal bone (n = 31), or left lateral wall (n = 31). For right and left lateral nasal walls, CT had greater sensitivity and specificity than US or radiography, and better agreed with intraoperative findings. However, for midline fractures of nasal bone, US had higher specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than CT. Although two US evaluations showed good agreements at all three sites, US findings obtained by the hockey-stick probe showed closer agreement with intraoperative findings for both lateral nasal wall and midline of nasal bone. Although CT showed higher sensitivity and specificity than US or radiography, US found to be helpful for evaluating the midline of nasal bone. Furthermore, for US examinations of the nasal bone, a smaller probe and higher frequency may be required.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估和比较超声检查(US)与放射线照相和多探测器计算机断层扫描(CT)对鼻骨骨折的诊断功效。包括接受前瞻性US检查的41例鼻骨骨折患者。在受伤当天获得X线平片和CT图像。在美国进行检查时,放射科医生对24例患者使用了线性阵列换能器(L17-5 MHz),对17例患者使用了曲棍球棒探头(L15-7 MHz)。鼻子的骨性成分分为三部分(左右鼻侧)壁和鼻骨中线)。对通过三种方式进行的骨折检测进行了分析。此外,将每种方式的发现与术中发现进行了比较。鼻骨骨折位于右侧侧壁(n = 28),鼻骨中线(n = 31)或左侧侧壁(n = 31)。对于左右鼻侧壁,CT的敏感性和特异性都比US或X线摄影更高,并且与术中检查结果更好地吻合。但是,对于鼻骨中线骨折,US比CT具有更高的特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。尽管两项美国评估显示在所有三个部位均具有良好的一致性,但曲棍球棒探针获得的美国发现显示与鼻侧壁外侧和鼻中线的术中发现更加一致。尽管CT显示的敏感性和特异性均高于US或X线摄影,但US发现有助于评估鼻骨中线。此外,对于美国鼻梁检查,可能需要较小的探头和较高的频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号