...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Comparison of chemical characteristics of Type A humic acids extracted from subsoils of paddy fields and surface ando soils
【24h】

Comparison of chemical characteristics of Type A humic acids extracted from subsoils of paddy fields and surface ando soils

机译:从稻田和地表土壤中提取的A型腐殖酸的化学特性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Chemical characteristics of highly humified humic acids (Type A HAs) from the subsoil of paddy fields (paddy soil HAs) and from the surface layer of ando soils (ando soil HAs) were compared based on the analyses of elemental composition, molecular size distribution, and C-13 CPMAS NMR spectra. Humic acids were extracted successively with 0.1 M NaOH and 0.1 M Na4P2O7. The results showed that paddy soil HAs were less oxidized or more decarboxylated than the ando soil HAs. Except O/C value, all the average values for the properties (e.g. C%, M-w and alkyl C%) did not differ significantly between paddy soil HAs and ando soil HAs. Almost all the chemical characteristics were correlated with RF value, which was an index of degree of humification, based on their spectrophotometric properties. The slopes of derived regression lines obtained from RF (independent variables) vs. C%n, H%, H/C value, unsaturated degree, weight average molecular weight, and percentage of each C species (dependent variables) differed significantly between paddy soil HAs and ando soil HAs. Therefore, their chemical structures were considered to differ from each other. Type A HAs with RF = 100 from ando soils consisted of both the highly and lowly humified HA molecules in blended and/or combined forms, while those from paddy soils were less heterogeneous. Chemical properties of Type A HAs with RF = 180 from paddy soils were rather similar to those from ando soils, although the carbonyl C content was noticeably lower than that of ando soil HAs. Ando soils have lost their non-humic components during the advance in the degree of humification, while conjugated electron transfer system of humic substances developed as well as the loss of non-humic components in paddy soil HAs.
机译:根据元素组成,分子大小分布,分子结构,分子质量和分子质量的分析,比较了稻田底土(水稻土)和安多土壤表层(安土)的腐殖酸(A型)的化学特性。和C-13 CPMAS NMR光谱。依次用0.1 M NaOH和0.1 M Na4P2O7提取腐殖酸。结果表明,稻田土壤HAs比安藤土壤HAs的氧化程度低或脱羧程度更高。除O / C值外,稻田土壤HAs和安多土壤HAs的所有特性平均值(例如C%,M-w和烷基C%)均没有显着差异。基于它们的分光光度特性,几乎所有化学特性都与RF值相关,RF值是腐化程度的指标。从RF(自变量)获得的回归回归线的斜率与C%n,H%,H / C值,不饱和度,重均分子量和每种C物种的百分比(因变量)之间的差异很大HA和安土土壤HA。因此,认为它们的化学结构彼此不同。来自安多土壤的RF = 100的A型HA由混合和/或组合形式的高腐殖质和低腐殖质HA分子组成,而稻田土壤的HA分子异质性较低。稻田土壤中RF = 180的A型HA的化学性质与安多土壤中的相似,尽管羰基C含量明显低于安多土壤HA。在腐殖化程度提高的过程中,安藤土壤失去了非腐殖质成分,而腐殖质的共轭电子转移系统以及水稻土壤HA中非腐殖质成分的丧失也得到了发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号