...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Stability of pyrochar and hydrochar in agricultural soil - a new field incubation method
【24h】

Stability of pyrochar and hydrochar in agricultural soil - a new field incubation method

机译:农用土壤中焦炭和水炭的稳定性-一种新的田间孵化方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The application of chars on soil offers an option to sequester carbon (C) and to improve soil fertility. Different types of chars are available as soil amendments, produced with mainly two different processes: pyrochar produced with pyrolysis and hydrochar produced with hydrothermal carbonization. However, there are few studies to assess the stability of these two char types in soils in situ at field sites. A 19-month in-situ field incubation was conducted in northern Germany. With a mini-plot method we were able to assess the decomposition dynamic of chars with few operational costs. Zinc was used as inert tracer mixed with the char in order to account mixing so that char losses could be accurately quantified. We used chars from Miscanthus (C4-plant) as feedstock with a higher delta 13C value than the C3 plant derived soil C. Changes in delta 13C value allowed the calculations of char-derived C in the soil at three sampling dates. While C derived from pyrochar did not change significantly over time, 23-30% of initial added hydrochar-C was mineralized after 19 months in-situ field incubation. There was no difference in the decomposition dynamics of the chars among the three field sites with different soil types. Moreover, we did not observe a decline in decomposition rates with time. For hydrochar the data were well fitted with a linear one-pool decay model. The average model derived mean residence times were 4 (95% confidence interval: 3-14) years for hydrochar and 60 (95% confidence interval: 16-224) years for pyrochar. Thus, while pyrochar has a higher potential for C-sequestration, faster mineralization of hydrochar compared to pyrochar showed their potential to act as a mid-term fertilizer through slow nutrient release to soils. Advantages of the Zinc method were the low price for application and analysis as well as the ability for farmers to manage their field in the course of their normal activities. However, variability in results gained from the Zinc method is not insignificant which mostly affect the calculated MRTs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在土壤上施用炭黑提供了隔离碳(C)和提高土壤肥力的选择。可提供不同类型的炭作为土壤改良剂,主要通过两种不同的方法生产:通过热解生成的焦炭和通过热液碳化生成的水炭。但是,很少有研究评估这两种炭类型在田间原位土壤中的稳定性。在德国北部进行了为期19个月的现场孵化。使用小图法,我们能够以很少的运营成本评估炭的分解动力学。锌用作与炭混合的惰性示踪剂,以便说明混合情况,以便可以准确定量炭损失。我们使用来自Miscanthus(C4-植物)的炭作为原料,其δ13C值高于C3植物衍生的土壤C。δ13C值的变化允许在三个采样日期计算土壤中炭衍生的C。虽然源自焦炭的碳随时间变化不大,但在原位野外温育19个月后,最初添加的水碳C的23-30%被矿化了。在三个不同土壤类型的田间地点,炭的分解动力学没有差异。而且,我们没有观察到分解率随时间下降。对于水焦油,数据很好地拟合了线性单池衰减模型。平均模型得出的平均停留时间对于水煤为4年(95%置信区间:3-14),对于焦煤为60年(95%置信区间:16-224)年。因此,尽管焦炭具有较高的碳封存潜力,但与焦炭相比,焦炭矿化速度更快,这表明它们有潜力通过将养分缓慢释放到土壤中而充当中期肥料。锌法的优点是应用和分析的价格低廉,以及农民在正常活动过程中对其田地进行管理的能力。但是,从锌方法获得的结果的可变性并不微不足道,这主要影响所计算的MRT。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号