首页> 外文期刊>Geochemical Journal >Geochemistry of Meso- and neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from northern Guangxi, China: Arc or plume magmatism?
【24h】

Geochemistry of Meso- and neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from northern Guangxi, China: Arc or plume magmatism?

机译:来自广西北部的中元古代和新元古代镁铁质超岩石性岩石的地球化学:弧流还是羽流岩浆作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Meso- and Neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from northern Guangxi show mainly calc-alkaline features. The mafic rocks have (Nb/La)(pm)(1)) = 0.13similar to0.51, (Th/La)(pm) = 0.85-3.3, Ti/Ti*(2)) = 0.29-0.79 and show negative Nb and Ti anomalies in primitive mantle normalized diagrams. The Mesoproterozoic mafic rocks have lower epsilon(Nd)(T) than those of Neoproterozoic, -1.99 similar to -5.13 vs. -0.74 similar to 2.4, respectively. They plot in the field of volcanic arc basalt in tectonic discrimination diagrams and display geochemical signatures of island arc volcanics. The mafic-ultramafic rocks are thought to be the products of magmatism of convergent plate boundary rather than derived from mantle plume. Therefore, they can not be regarded as an indicator of breakup of Rodinia supercontinent.
机译:来自广西北部的中元古代和新元古代镁铁-超镁铁岩主要表现出钙碱性特征。镁铁质岩石的(Nb / La)(pm)(1))= 0.13类似于0.51,(Th / La)(pm)= 0.85-3.3,Ti / Ti *(2))= 0.29-0.79并显示原始地幔归一化图中的负Nb和Ti异常。中元古代镁铁质岩石的ε(Nd)(T)比新元古代低,分别为-1.99和-0.74,分别为-5.13和-0.74。它们在构造判别图中绘制在火山弧玄武岩领域,并显示岛弧火山岩的地球化学特征。镁铁质-超镁铁质岩石被认为是汇聚板块边界岩浆作用的产物,而不是源于地幔柱。因此,它们不能被认为是罗迪尼亚超大陆分裂的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号