首页> 外文期刊>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde >Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No.015/070, April 2015)
【24h】

Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No.015/070, April 2015)

机译:良性疾病子宫切除术的适应症和途径。 DGGG,OEGGG和SGGG指南(S3级,AWMF注册号015 / 070,2015年4月)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Official guideline indications and methods of hysterectomy to assign indications for the different methods published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). Besides vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy, three additional techniques have been implemented due to the introduction of laparoscopy. Organ-sparing alternatives were also integrated. Methods: The guideline group consisted of 26 experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Recommendations were developed using a structured consensus process and independent moderation. A systematic literature search and quality appraisal of benefits and harms of the therapeutic alternatives for symptomatic fibroids, dysfunctional bleeding and adenomyosis was done through MEDLINE up to 6/2014 focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Results: All types of hysterectomy led in studies to high rates of patient satisfaction. If possible, vaginal instead of abdominal hysterectomy should preferably be done. If a vaginal hysterectomy is not feasible, the possibility of a laparoscopic hysterectomy should be considered. An abdominal hysterectomy should only be done with a special indication. Organ-sparing interventions also led to high patient satisfaction rates, but contain the risk of symptom recurrence. Conclusion: As an aim, patients should be enabled to choose that therapeutic intervention for their benign disease of the uterus that convenes best to them and their personal life situation.
机译:背景:官方指南适应症和子宫切除术的方法,以适应由德国妇产科学会(DGGG),奥地利妇产科学会(OEGGG)和瑞士妇产科学会( SGGG)。除了阴道和腹部子宫切除术之外,由于引入了腹腔镜检查,还实施了另外三种技术。还集成了保留器官的替代方法。方法:指南小组由来自德国,奥地利和瑞士的26位专家组成。使用结构化共识流程和独立审核制定建议。直到6/2014为止,通过MEDLINE进行了系统的文献检索和对有症状的肌瘤,功能失调性出血和子宫腺肌病的治疗方案的利弊进行质量评估,重点是系统评价和荟萃分析。结果:所有类型的子宫切除术都导致了较高的患者满意度。如果可能的话,应首选阴道代替腹部子宫切除术。如果阴道子宫切除术不可行,则应考虑腹腔镜子宫切除术的可能性。腹部子宫切除术应仅在有特殊适应症的情况下进行。保留器官的干预措施还导致较高的患者满意度,但存在症状复发的风险。结论:目标是使患者能够针对自己的子宫良性疾病选择最适合自己及其个人生活状况的治疗性干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号