...
首页> 外文期刊>Burns: Including Thermal Injury >Developing a burn injury severity score (BISS): Adding age and total body surface area burned to the injury severity score (ISS) improves mortality concordance
【24h】

Developing a burn injury severity score (BISS): Adding age and total body surface area burned to the injury severity score (ISS) improves mortality concordance

机译:制定烧伤严重程度评分(BISS):在烧伤严重程度评分(ISS)中增加年龄和烧伤总表面积可改善死亡率一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background There is limited research validating the injury severity score (ISS) in burns. We examined the concordance of ISS with burn mortality. We hypothesized that combining age and total body surface area (TBSA) burned to the ISS gives a more accurate mortality risk estimate. Methods Data from the Royal Perth Hospital Trauma Registry and the Royal Perth Hospital Burns Minimum Data Set were linked. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measured concordance of ISS with mortality. Using logistic regression models with death as the dependent variable we developed a burn-specific injury severity score (BISS). Results There were 1344 burns with 24 (1.8%) deaths, median TBSA 5% (IQR 2-10), and median age 36 years (IQR 23-50). The results show ISS is a good predictor of death for burns when ISS ≤ 15 (OR 1.29, p = 0.02), but not for ISS 15 (ISS 16-24: OR 1.09, p = 0.81; ISS 25-49: OR 0.81, p = 0.19). Comparing the AUCs adjusted for age, gender and cause, ISS of 84% (95% CI 82-85%) and BISS of 95% (95% CI 92-98%), demonstrated superior performance of BISS as a mortality predictor for burns. Conclusion ISS is a poor predictor of death in severe burns. The BISS combines ISS with age and TBSA and performs significantly better than the ISS.
机译:背景技术有限的研究可验证烧伤中的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。我们检查了ISS与烧伤死亡率的一致性。我们假设结合年龄和燃烧至ISS的全身表面积(TBSA)可以得出更准确的死亡风险估计。方法将来自皇家珀斯医院创伤登记处的数据和皇家珀斯医院烧伤最小数据集进行链接。接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积测量了ISS与死亡率的一致性。使用以死亡为因变量的逻辑回归模型,我们开发了烧伤特异性损伤严重程度评分(BISS)。结果共烧伤1344例,死亡24例(1.8%),TBSA中位数为5%(IQR 2-10),中位年龄36岁(IQR 23-50)。结果表明,当ISS≤15(或1.29,p = 0.02)时,ISS可以很好地预测烧伤死亡,而对于ISS 15(ISS 16-24:或1.09,p = 0.81; ISS 25-49:或0.81),ISS则可以很好地预测死亡,p = 0.19)。比较针对年龄,性别和病因调整的AUC,ISS为84%(95%CI 82-85%)和BISS为95%(95%CI 92-98%),证明BISS作为烧伤死亡率的预测指标具有优越的性能。结论ISS对于严重烧伤的死亡预测效果不佳。 BISS将ISS与年龄和TBSA相结合,并且其性能明显优于ISS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号