【24h】

Tectonic discrimination of basalts with classification trees

机译:分类树对玄武岩的构造判别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditionally, geochemical classification of basaltic rocks of unknown tectonic affinity has been performed by discrimination diagrams. Although easy to use, this method is fairly inaccurate because it only uses bi- or trivariate data. Furthermore, many popular discrimination diagrams are statistically not very rigorous because the decision boundaries are drawn by eye, and they ignore closure, thus violating the rules of compositional data analysis. Classification trees approximate the data space by a stepwise constant function, and are a more rigorous and potentially more effective way to determine tectonic affinity. Trees allow the simultaneous use of an unlimited number of geochemical features, while still permitting visualization by an easy-to-use, two-dimensional graph. Two classification trees are presented for the discrimination of basalts of mid-ocean ridge, ocean island, and island arc affinities. The first tree uses 51 major, minor, and trace elements and isotopic ratios and should be used for the classification of fresh basalt samples. A second tree only uses high field strength element analyses and isotopic ratios, and can also be used for basalts that have undergone alteration. The probability of successful classification is 89% for the first and 84% for the second tree, as determined by 10-fold cross-validation. Even though the trees presented in this paper use many geochemical features, it is not a problem if some of these are missing in the unknown sample. Classification trees solve this problem with surrogate variables, which give more or less the same decision as the primary variables. The advantages of the classification tree approach over discrimination diagrams are illustrated by a comparative test on a sample dataset of known tectonic affinities. Although arguably better than discrimination diagrams, classification trees are not perfect, and the limitations of the method are illustrated on a published dataset of basalts from the Pindos Basin (Greece). (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:传统上,构造分辨力未知的玄武岩的地球化学分类是通过判别图进行的。尽管易于使用,但此方法非常不准确,因为它仅使用双变量或三变量数据。此外,许多流行的判别图在统计上不是很严格,因为决策边界是用肉眼绘制的,并且它们忽略闭合,因此违反了构成数据分析的规则。分类树通过逐步常数函数来近似数据空间,并且是确定构造亲和力的更严格,可能更有效的方法。树木允许同时使用无限数量的地球化学特征,同时仍允许通过易于使用的二维图形进行可视化。提出了两种分类树,用于区分中洋脊,海洋岛和岛弧亲和力的玄武岩。第一棵树使用51种主要,次要和微量元素及同位素比率,应用于新鲜玄武岩样品的分类。第二棵树仅使用高场强元素分析和同位素比,也可用于发生蚀变的玄武岩。通过10倍交叉验证,成功分类的概率为第一棵树为89%,第二棵树为84%。即使本文介绍的树木具有许多地球化学特征,但如果未知样品中缺少其中一些特征,这也不成问题。分类树通过代理变量解决了这个问题,代理变量或多或少地提供了与主变量相同的决策。通过对已知构造亲和力的样本数据集进行的比较测试,说明了分类树方法优于区分图的优势。尽管可以说比分辨图更好,但分类树并不是完美的,该方法的局限性在Pindos盆地(希腊)的已发布玄武岩数据集上得到了说明。 (c)2005 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号