...
首页> 外文期刊>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta: Journal of the Geochemical Society and the Meteoritical Society >Distinguishing between basalts produced by endogenic volcanism and impact processes: A non-destructive method using quantitative petrography of lunar basaltic samples
【24h】

Distinguishing between basalts produced by endogenic volcanism and impact processes: A non-destructive method using quantitative petrography of lunar basaltic samples

机译:区分内生火山岩产生的玄武岩和撞击过程:使用月球玄武岩样品定量岩相学的非破坏性方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Impact processes play an important role in shaping and reshaping the surfaces of airless planetary bodies. Such processes produce regoliths and generate melts that crystallize and record the homogenization of the geology at the impact site. If the volume of melt is substantial, the resultant crystallized product has an igneous texture and may be free of xenolithic clasts making it difficult to distinguish from melts produced by endogenic magmatic processes. This has been clearly demonstrated during the return of the Apollo samples from the Moon, where Apollo 14 basalt 14310 was initially described as a mare basalt and was only subsequently reclassified as an impact melt following detailed and time consuming crystallization experiments. Another way of distinguishing lunar impact melts from endogenically-derived mare basalts is through the quantification of the highly siderophile elements (HSE: Pd, Rh, Ru, Ir, Pt, Os), which have relatively low abundances in pristine lunar samples but are high in meteorites and, therefore, may be enriched in impact melts. However, these analyses consume relatively large quantities of valuable sample and because of mass constraints cannot be performed on many lunar samples. In this paper we present a quantitative petrographic method that has the potential to distinguish lunar impact melts from endogenically-derived mare basalts using plagioclase and olivine crystal size distributions (CSDs). The slopes and intercepts of these CSDs are used to show that olivine from impact melts displays a steeper CSD relative to olivine from mare basalts. For plagioclase, generally impacts melts display CSDs with shallower gradients than those from endogenous mare basalts and, as for olivines, plot in a distinct field on a CSD slope vs. CSD intercept plot. Using just a thin section to distinguish impact melts from mare basalts enables the goals of future robotic sample return missions to determine the age of the South Pole-Aitken basin in the Moon, because such missions will potentially only return small (2-4 mm) "rocklets" for analysis, obviating HSE analyses for impact melt identification. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:冲击过程在整形和重塑无气行星体的表面中起着重要作用。这样的过程会产生碎屑岩,并产生熔体,这些熔体会结晶并记录撞击点处地质的均质性。如果熔体的体积很大,则所得的结晶产物具有火成的质地,并且可能没有异石碎屑,从而难以与内生岩浆过程所产生的熔体区分开。在从月球返回阿波罗样品的过程中已经清楚地证明了这一点,其中阿波罗14玄武岩14310最初被描述为母马玄武岩,随后经过详细且耗时的结晶实验才被重新分类为冲击熔体。区分内源性母马玄武岩中月球撞击熔体的另一种方法是通过定量高度亲铁性元素(HSE:Pd,Rh,Ru,Ir,Pt,Os),这些元素在原始月球样品中的丰度相对较低,但含量较高在陨石中,因此可能富含冲击熔体。但是,这些分析消耗相对大量的有价值的样本,并且由于质量限制,无法在许多月球样本上执行。在本文中,我们提出了一种定量岩相学方法,该方法具有使用斜长石和橄榄石晶体尺寸分布(CSD)来区分月球撞击熔体与内源性母马玄武岩的能力。这些CSD的斜率和截距用于表明,与熔岩玄武岩中的橄榄石相比,冲击熔体中的橄榄石显示出更陡峭的CSD。对于斜长石,一般而言,冲击熔体的CSD梯度要比内生母玄武岩的CSD梯度要浅,而对于橄榄石,则在CSD斜率与CSD截距图的不同区域中绘制。仅用薄薄的部分来区分撞击熔岩和母马玄武岩,就可以使未来的机器人样本返回任务的目标确定月球南极-艾特肯盆地的年龄,因为此类任务可能只会返回很小的(2-4毫米) “小火箭”进行分析,而无需进行HSE分析来识别熔体。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号