首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Physiology >Effect of frequency and pulse duration on human muscle fatigue during repetitive electrical stimulation.
【24h】

Effect of frequency and pulse duration on human muscle fatigue during repetitive electrical stimulation.

机译:频率和脉冲持续时间对重复性电刺激过程中人体肌肉疲劳的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different combinations of stimulation frequency and intensity can generate a targeted force during functional electrical stimulation (FES). This study compared isometric performance and muscle fatigue during repetitive stimulation with three different combinations of frequency and pulse duration that produced the same initial peak forces: protocol 1 used long pulse duration (fixed at 600 micros) and 11.5 +/- 1.2 Hz (low frequency); protocol 2 used 30 Hz (medium frequency) and medium pulse duration (150 +/- 21 micros); and protocol 3 used 60 Hz (high frequency) and short pulse duration (131 +/- 24 micros). Twenty and 60 Hz pre- and postfatigue testing trains were delivered at the pulse duration used by the fatiguing trains and at 600 micros pulse duration. The percentage decline in peak force between the first and last fatiguing train of each protocol was the measure of muscle performance. The declines in peak force of the 60 Hz testing trains were used to measure muscle fatigue. The 20 Hz:60 Hz peak force ratio was used as a measure of low-frequency fatigue. The results showed that protocol 1 produced the least decline in peak force in response to the fatiguing trains, as well as the least muscle fatigue and low-frequency fatigue when the pulse duration was maintained at the level used by the fatiguing trains. Interestingly, protocol 2 produced the least muscle fatigue, and there were no differences in the levels of low-frequency fatigue across protocols when a comparable motor unit population was tested using 600 micros pulse duration. The results suggest that if the frequency and intensity are kept constant during FES, using the lowest frequency and longest pulse duration may maximize performance.
机译:刺激频率和强度的不同组合可以在功能性电刺激(FES)期间产生目标力。这项研究将重复刺激期间的等距性能和肌肉疲劳与频率和脉冲持续时间的三种不同组合(产生相同的初始峰值力)进行了比较:方案1使用较长的脉冲持续时间(固定为600微米)和11.5 +/- 1.2 Hz(低频);协议2使用30 Hz(中频)和中等脉冲持续时间(150 +/- 21 micros);协议3使用60 Hz(高频)和短脉冲持续时间(131 +/- 24微秒)。在疲劳火车使用的脉冲持续时间和600微秒脉冲持续时间下交付了20和60 Hz的疲劳前和疲劳后测试火车。每个方案的第一个疲劳训练和最后一个疲劳训练之间的峰值力量下降百分比是肌肉性能的量度。 60 Hz测试序列的峰值力下降用于测量肌肉疲劳。 20 Hz:60 Hz峰值力比用作低频疲劳的量度。结果表明,当脉冲持续时间保持在疲劳训练所用的水平时,方案1产生的峰值力对疲劳训练的下降最小,同时肌肉疲劳和低频疲劳也最小。有趣的是,方案2产生的肌肉疲劳最小,并且当使用600微秒脉冲持续时间测试可比较的运动单位人口时,方案之间的低频疲劳水平没有差异。结果表明,如果在FES期间频率和强度保持恒定,则使用最低频率和最长脉冲持续时间可能会最大化性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号