首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >A specialist nurse led liaison model of care reduced unscheduled care for acute asthma in a deprived multiethnic area
【24h】

A specialist nurse led liaison model of care reduced unscheduled care for acute asthma in a deprived multiethnic area

机译:由专业护士领导的护理联络模型可减少多民族贫困地区的非计划性急性哮喘护理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is increasing recognition that minority ethnic groups have higher rates of disease exacerbation and hospital admissions for asthma.Studies have shown that about 15% of patients discharged from hospital or emergency facilities are readmitted within 2 weeks.Research is limited on specific interventions that reduce unscheduled asthma care, although post-discharge asthma education involving inhaler technique, peak flow recordings, or written symptom based action plans have been shown to reduce morbidity and relapse rates.The studies by Castro ef al and Griffiths ef a/ assessed the effect of specialist nurse interventions on unscheduled care or hospital emergency admission rates for [mostly] minority group patients with asthma. The studies varied in methodology, but both were prospective, included patients with physician diagnosed asthma who attended the ED, and assessed health care utilisation outcomes and quality of life at 1 year. However, the study populations differed: Castro ef al enrolled mainly African-American women 18-65 years of age, whereas Griffiths ef al enrolled mostly South Asian, black African, or Afro-Caribbean patients aged 4-60 years. As well, in the US based study by Castro ef al, the intervention occurred primarily in hospital, whereas in the UK based study by Griffiths ef a/, the intervention occurred primarily in general practices and comprised both patient and clinician education and support.The lack of an economic analysis by Griffiths ef al may be important because the study by Castro ef al required more intensive intervention. Griffiths ef a/ did not provide the more costly face to face nurse time or telephone contact with patients. Although both studies reduced hospital admissions, only Castro ef al found differences in quality of life measures and medication use.The findings of these 2 studies are relevant to specialist nurses working with asthma patients in primary and secondary care settings. Both studies provide support for the use of specialist nurse interventions to reduce the use of emergency facilities for asthma care and to identify the patients who will use them. The results highlight the increased use of emergency services by minority groups for asthma care. This may indicate that current service provision disadvantages these patients, and their dissatisfaction with current services may require alternative approaches to asthma care. In particular, although the study by Griffiths ef a/was not powered to measure differences in outcome for different ethnic groups, there was a suggestion that the intervention might provide greater benefits to white patients. Further research is required to determine the varying needs of different ethnic groups in asthma management. Both studies found that identifying patients with repeated use of emergency services and focusing interventions on these patients were beneficial. However, the precise components of the intervention and the patient groups to which they should be targeted are still to be determined.
机译:越来越多的人意识到少数族裔的疾病加重率和哮喘住院率更高,研究表明,大约15%的出院或急诊设施出院的患者在2周内可以再次入院,但针对减少意外事件的特定干预措施的研究有限哮喘护理,尽管出院后哮喘教育涉及吸入技术,峰值流量记录或基于症状的书面行动计划已被证明可以降低发病率和复发率。Castro ef al和Griffiths ef a /的研究评估了专科护士的效果少数哮喘患者的计划外护理或医院急诊入院率的干预措施。这项研究的方法各不相同,但均是前瞻性的,包括经急诊科就诊并经医生诊断为哮喘的患者,并评估了一年的医疗保健利用率和生活质量。但是,研究人群有所不同:Castro等人主要招募18-65岁的非洲裔美国人女性,而Griffiths等人则主要招募4-60岁的南亚,黑人非洲或非洲加勒比地区的患者。同样,在Castro等人在美国进行的研究中,干预主要发生在医院,而在Griffiths等人在英国进行的研究中,干预主要在一般实践中进行,包括患者和临床医生的教育和支持。缺乏格里菲斯等人的经济分析可能很重要,因为卡斯特罗等人的研究需要更深入的干预。 Griffiths ef a /没有提供更昂贵的面对面护理时间或与患者的电话联系。尽管两项研究均减少了住院人数,但只有卡斯特罗(Castro)等人发现生活质量衡量和药物使用方面存在差异。这两项研究的发现与在初级和二级医疗机构为哮喘患者工作的专科护士有关。两项研究均支持使用专业护士干预措施,以减少哮喘病急救设施的使用,并确定将使用这些措施的患者。结果表明,少数群体越来越多地使用紧急服务进行哮喘护理。这可能表明当前的服务提供对这些患者不利,而他们对当前服务的不满可能需要哮喘治疗的替代方法。尤其是,尽管格里菲斯(Griffiths)等人的研究无法衡量不同种族群体在结局方面的差异,但有人建议该干预措施可能为白人患者带来更大的益处。需要进一步的研究来确定不同种族在哮喘管理中的不同需求。两项研究均发现,识别反复使用紧急服务的患者并针对这些患者进行干预是有益的。但是,干预措施的确切组成部分和应针对的患者群体仍有待确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号