首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >Review: full body washing with skin antiseptics before surgery does not prevent surgical site infection
【24h】

Review: full body washing with skin antiseptics before surgery does not prevent surgical site infection

机译:综述:术前用皮肤消毒剂全身清洗不能预防手术部位感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is self evidenf that personal hygiene and washing reduces the risk of infection.Supporting evidence has been provided by the many research studies that have evaluated preoperative skin preparation. Even so, surgical site infection is still a far too common occurrence in hospitals, accounting for about 14-16% of nosocomial infections.In today's healthcare service, prevention of acquired infection is paramount, not only to ensure patient wellbeing, but also in light of public opinion, media attention, government drivers, and financial constraints.The coherent and comprehensive systematic review by Webster and Osborne is timely and has implications for practice. The review was well conducted and clearly reported, fulfilling the criteria for a good quality systematic review. The authors completed a thorough search of existing literature and reviewed relevant trials. They gave a clear rationale for the selection of trials and explained each step of the review process clearly. All RCTs included in the review evaluated preoperative washing with chlorhexidine, although trials differed in the control treatment used. These separate comparisons provide useful information about the effects of various methods of washing but, because trials with different control treatments were not combined into a single meta-analysis, a common conclusion can not reliably be drawn. Overall, however, the large sample sizes involved and the rigour of the systematic review ensure that appropriate analyses were undertaken and meaningful results presented.The conclusion of the review by Webster and Osborne is that full body washing with an antiseptic, specifically chlorhexidine, is no more effective in preventing surgical site infection than washing with ordinary soap. Discontinuing use of chlorhexidine could result in a reduction in costs, although 1 study found no significant difference in cost between antiseptic and placebo. Infection control principles remain important when preparing patients for surgery. The finding that different types of cleansing agents are similarly effective suggests that the choice of a specific agent can reflect patient preference and resource availability.
机译:不言而喻,个人卫生和洗手可减少感染的风险。许多评估术前皮肤准备的研究提供了支持性证据。即便如此,手术部位感染仍是医院中非常普遍的事情,约占医院感染的14-16%。在当今的医疗保健服务中,预防获得性感染至关重要,不仅要确保患者的健康,而且要轻而易举。韦伯斯特和奥斯本的连贯而全面的系统评价是及时的,对实践具有重要意义。审查进行得很好并且报告清楚,符合高质量系统审查的标准。作者完成了对现有文献的彻底搜索并审查了相关试验。他们为选择试验提供了明确的理由,并清楚说明了审查过程的每个步骤。该评价中包括的所有RCT均评估了术前用洗必泰清洗的效果,尽管所用的对照治疗方法不同。这些单独的比较提供了有关各种洗涤方法效果的有用信息,但是,由于没有将采用不同对照处理的试验合并为一个荟萃分析,因此无法可靠地得出一个共同的结论。但是总的来说,由于涉及的样本量较大且系统的审查较为严格,因此可以确保进行适当的分析并得出有意义的结果.Webster和Osborne的审查结论是,使用杀菌剂(特别是洗必泰)进行全身清洗不是与用普通肥皂清洗相比,预防手术部位感染更有效。停止使用洗必泰可以降低成本,尽管一项研究发现防腐剂和安慰剂之间的成本没有显着差异。在为患者准备手术时,感染控制原则仍然很重要。不同类型的清洁剂同样有效的发现表明,特定清洁剂的选择可以反映出患者的喜好和资源可用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号