首页> 外文期刊>European journal of ophthalmology >Tonometry in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen crosslinking using three different tonometers
【24h】

Tonometry in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen crosslinking using three different tonometers

机译:三种不同眼压计在核黄素/ UVA角膜胶原交联前后的圆锥角膜眼压

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose. To evaluate the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT), and the ocular response analyzer (ORA) tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/ultraviolet A corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL), to assess agreement among devices and to analyze the impact of some ocular parameters on their measurements.Methods. Fifty keratoconic eyes were included. Intraocular pressure was measured with GAT, PDCT, and ORA before and after CXL. Fifty nonkeratoconic eyes served as controls. Device agreements were calculated by Bland-Altman analysis. The effect of some ocular characteristics on IOP measurement differences between tonometers was determined.Results. Between the 2 groups, there were statistically significant differences in all examined parameters. Preoperatively in both groups a statistically significant difference was found in IOP measurements among devices (p<0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias among devices. On average, PDCT overread GAT and ORA. The IOP measurement differences were better predicted by corneal resistance factor. Postoperatively, in keratoconus eyes, there was no statistically significant difference in IOP measurements among the 3 tonometers (p>0.05). The IOP readings with all tonometers after treatment were higher than those obtained preoperatively; however, not to a statistically significant level, with the exception of PDCT and ORA readings at the first month postoperatively. Corneal resistance factor measurements have no significant change after CXL.Conclusions. Pascal dynamic contour tonometer could provide more consistent and closer to the true IOP readings than GAT and ORA in healthy eyes with corneal thickness outside the 520-550 mum range, in keratoconus patients and after CXL. Corneal resistance factor was associated significantly with agreement among devices.
机译:目的。为了评估戈德曼压平眼压计(GAT),帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计(PDCT)和眼反应分析仪(ORA)眼压计在核黄素/紫外线A角膜胶原交联(CXL)前后测量圆锥角膜眼的眼内压(IOP) ),以评估设备之间的一致性并分析某些眼参数对其测量的影响。包括五十只圆锥角膜眼睛。在CXL之前和之后,使用GAT,PDCT和ORA测量眼内压。五十只非圆锥角膜眼睛用作对照。通过Bland-Altman分析计算设备协议。确定了一些眼部特征对眼压计之间眼压测量差异的影响。在两组之间,所有检查的参数在统计学上都有显着差异。两组术前在设备间的眼压测量结果均存在统计学差异(p <0.05)。 Bland-Altman分析显示设备之间存在偏差。平均而言,PDCT会覆盖GAT和ORA。通过角膜抵抗因子可以更好地预测眼压测量的差异。术后,在圆锥角膜眼中,三个眼压计的眼压测量值无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。治疗后所有眼压计的IOP读数均高于术前。但是,除了术后第一个月的PDCT和ORA读数外,均未达到统计学上的显着水平。 CXL后角膜抵抗因子的测量无明显变化。在角膜厚度在520-550微米范围内的健康眼中,圆锥角膜患者和CXL之后,Pascal动态轮廓眼压计可以提供比GAT和ORA更一致和更接近真实IOP读数。角膜抵抗因子与设备之间的一致性显着相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号