...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: Analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes
【24h】

Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: Analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes

机译:消费者具有策略性时的动态定价:已过帐和或有定价方案的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We study dynamic pricing policies for a monopolist selling perishable products over a finite time horizon to strategic buyers. Buyers are strategic in the sense that they anticipate the firm’s price policies. It is expensive and administratively difficult for most brick and mortar retailers to change prices, placing limits on the number of price changes and the types of pricing policies they can adopt. The simplest policy is to commit to a set of price changes. A more complex alternative is to let the price depend on sales history. We investigate two pricing schemes that we call posted and contingent pricing. Using the posted pricing scheme, the firm announces a set of prices at the beginning of the horizon. In the contingent pricing scheme, price evolution depends upon demand realization. Our focus is on the posted pricing scheme because of its ease of implementation. Counter to intuition, we find that neither a posted pricing scheme nor a contingent pricing scheme is dominant and the difference in expected revenues of these two schemes is small. Limiting the number of price changes will result in a decrease in expected revenues. We show that a multi-unit auction with a reservation price provides an upper bound for expected revenues for both pricing schemes. Numerical examples suggest that a posted pricing scheme with two or three price changes is enough to achieve revenues that are close to the upper bound. Dynamic pricing is only useful when strategic buyers perceive scarcity. We study the impact of scarcity and derive the optimal stocking levels for large markets. Finally, we investigate whether or not it is optimal for the seller to conceal inventory or sales information from buyers. A firm benefits if it does not reveal the number of units it has available for sale at the beginning of the season, or subsequently withholds information about the number of units sold.
机译:我们研究了垄断者在有限时间内向战略买家出售易腐产品的动态定价政策。买方具有战略意义,因为他们可以预期公司的价格政策。对于大多数实体零售商而言,改变价格既昂贵又在管理上很困难,从而限制了价格变化的数量以及他们可以采用的定价政策的类型。最简单的政策是承诺一组价格变动。一个更复杂的选择是让价格取决于销售历史。我们研究了称为定价和或有定价的两种定价方案。公司使用发布的定价方案,在地平线开始时宣布一组价格。在或有定价方案中,价格演变取决于需求的实现。由于其易于实施,我们的重点是发布的定价方案。与直觉相反,我们发现既不采用过帐定价方案也不采用或有定价方案,并且这两种方案的预期收入差异很小。限制价格变动的数量将导致预期收入的减少。我们显示,具有保留价格的多单位拍卖为两种定价方案提供了预期收入的上限。数值示例表明,具有两个或三个价格变化的已发布定价方案足以实现接近上限的收入。动态定价仅在战略买家意识到稀缺性时才有用。我们研究了稀缺性的影响,并得出了大型市场的最佳库存水平。最后,我们调查对卖方而言,隐藏买方的库存或销售信息是否最佳。如果一家公司在季节开始之初未透露其可供出售的单位数量,或者随后不提供有关已出售单位数量的信息,则该公司将从中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号