...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Multi-item inventory control with full truckloads: A comparison of aggregate and individual order triggering
【24h】

Multi-item inventory control with full truckloads: A comparison of aggregate and individual order triggering

机译:满载情况下的多物料库存控制:汇总和单个订单触发的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we consider the stochastic joint replenishment problem in an environment where transportation costs are dominant and full truckloads or full container loads are required. One replenishment policy, taking into account capacity restrictions of the total order volume, is the so-called QS policy, where replenishment orders are placed to raise the individual inventory positions of all items to their order-up-to levels, whenever the aggregate inventory position drops below the reorder level. We first provide a method to compute the policy parameters of a QS policy such that item target service levels can be met, under the assumption that demand can be modeled as a compound renewal process. The approximation formulas are based on renewal theory and are tested in a simulation study which reveals good performance. Second, we compare the QS policy with a simple allocation policy where replenishment orders are triggered by the individual inventory positions of the items. At the moment when an individual inventory position drops below its item reorder level, a replenishment order is triggered and the total vehicle capacity is allocated to all items such that the expected elapsed time before the next replenishment order is maximized. In an extensive simulation study it is illustrated that the QS policy outperforms this allocation policy since it results in lower inventory levels for the same service level. Although both policies lead to similar performance if items are identical, it can differ substantially if the item characteristics vary.
机译:在本文中,我们考虑在运输成本占主导地位且需要满载卡车或满载集装箱的环境中的随机联合补给问题。考虑到总订单量的容量限制,一种补货策略是所谓的QS策略,即在放置补货订单时,只要总库存量达到最高,所有项目的单个库存位置就会增加到其订单水平。头寸跌至再订货水平以下。我们首先提供一种计算QS策略的策略参数的方法,以便在可以将需求建模为复合续订过程的前提下,满足项目目标服务水平。近似公式基于更新理论,并在模拟研究中进行了测试,揭示了良好的性能。其次,我们将QS策略与简单的分配策略进行比较,在该策略中,补货订单由物料的各个库存位置触发。当单个库存头寸降至其物料再订购水平以下时,将触发补货订单,并将总车辆容量分配给所有物料,以使下一个补货订单之前的预计经过时间最大化。在广泛的模拟研究中,可以证明QS策略优于此分配策略,因为它导致相同服务水平的较低库存水平。尽管如果项目相同,这两种策略都会导致相似的性能,但是如果项目特征不同,它可能会大不相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号