...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal >Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010
【24h】

Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010

机译:输卵管绝育:法国2006-2010年宫腔镜与腹腔镜绝育后的怀孕率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To compare the rates of pregnancy among women who underwent Essure" hysteroscopic sterilization versus tubal ligation in France between 2006 and 2010. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Hospital care in France (nationwide). Anonymised database of all hospital discharge summaries in France. Patients: Recruitment was based on procedure codes in the national database of hospital discharge summaries. The study included all women who underwent tubal sterilization by Essure^ microinserts or by tubal ligation and subsequently were hospitalised either for all unexpected pregnancies related diagnosis (e.g., miscarriage, legal abortion, or delivery) or for pregnancies following reversal microsurgery or in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Measurements and main results: During the study period, French hospitals performed 109,277 tubal sterilization procedures: 39,169 Essure'-: sterilizations and 70,108 laparoscopic tubal ligations. The respective indication of both techniques depended on the surgeons' skill. The median age of the two populations was similar, 41 years (range 28-52) for Essure? patients and 40 years (range 27-54) for those undergoing tubal ligation (p = 0.42). A Cox model has been performed. Following sterilization, after adjustment on age Essure;W patients became pregnant at a significantly lower rate than laparoscopic ligation patients 0.36% versus 0.46%, respectively (HR=0.62 (040-096)), and their pregnancy rate of post-sterilization procedure was significantly lower (reversal microsurgeries: 0.02% versus 0.19% (p < 0.001), IVF treatment: 0.08% versus 0.27%) (p < 0.001). The pregnancy rates after IVF were 12.5% and 5.35%, respectively, and 0% and 11.36% after tubal repair. Conclusion: This nationwide study of tubal sterilization demonstrates that Essure1c was associated with lower rates of pregnancy versus tubal ligation.
机译:目的:比较2006年至2010年法国接受Essure宫腔镜绝育术和输卵管结扎术的妇女的妊娠率。研究设计:回顾性队列研究环境:法国(全国)医院护理。所有出院摘要的匿名数据库在法国,患者:招募是基于国家出院摘要数据库中的程序代码进行的,该研究包括所有通过Essure ^微插入或输卵管结扎术进行了输卵管绝育术,然后因所有意外怀孕相关诊断而住院的妇女(例如,流产,合法流产或分娩)或进行反向显微外科手术或体外受精(IVF)治疗后的怀孕。测量和主要结果:在研究期间,法国医院进行了109,277例输卵管绝育手术:39,169例Essure'-:绝育和70,108例腹腔镜输卵管结扎术。技术取决于外科医生的技能。两种人群的年龄中位数相近,是否为41岁(28-52岁)?输卵管结扎的患者和40岁(范围27-54)(p = 0.42)。已经执行了Cox模型。绝育后,调整年龄放心后; W患者的怀孕率显着低于腹腔镜结扎患者,分别为0.36%和0.46%(HR = 0.62(040-096)),并且其绝育后手术的怀孕率为显着降低(逆向显微手术:0.02%比0.19%(p <0.001),体外受精治疗:0.08%比0.27%)(p <0.001)。试管婴儿后的妊娠率分别为12.5%和5.35%,输卵管修复后的妊娠率为0%和11.36%。结论:这项全国范围的输卵管绝育研究表明,与输卵管结扎相比,Essure1c与较低的妊娠率相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号