...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal >Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases.
【24h】

Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases.

机译:患有无症状宫颈息肉的妇女可能不需要看妇科医生或将其切除:对1126例病例的观察性回顾性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the prevalence of pathology in cervical polyps and whether referring and/or removing them is justified, (2) to assess the frequency of associated endometrial pathology and whether investigating the uterine cavity is warranted, and (3) to estimate the financial costs of processing cervical polyps. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the histopathology database and case notes of women who had cervical polyps examined at the pathology department of Ipswich Hospital, UK, over a seven-year period from 01/01/2002 to 31/12/2008. RESULTS: The number of cervical polyps removed from 988 women was 1126. Each case of polyps was considered as a separate episode. The recurrence rate was 15%. All polyps were benign except two (0.2%) symptomatic polyps that showed high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The cost of referring women with cervical polyps (excluding women aged >45 years with abnormal bleeding and those with abnormal smear) to see a gynaecologist and of examining polyps histologically was estimated to be pound 94816.40. Further investigations to assess the cervix and/or uterine cavity which were performed for 133 women (14.3%), because of the cervical polyps and for no other clinical indication, showed no significant pathology at cost of pound 41195.54. CONCLUSION: Our data do not justify referring women with asymptomatic cervical polyps to see a gynaecologist. Further, removing these polyps and investigating the uterine cavity is not warranted. A policy of removing polyps from only symptomatic women or those with abnormal smear and limiting histological examination to these polyps would result in significant savings.
机译:目的:(1)确定宫颈息肉的病理学患病率,以及是否有理由转诊和/或切除它们是合理的;(2)评估相关子宫内膜病理学的频率以及是否有必要调查子宫腔;(3)估计处理宫颈息肉的财务成本。研究设计:从2002年1月1日至2008年12月31日,在英国伊普斯威奇医院病理科检查了宫颈息肉的妇女的组织病理学数据库和病例笔记的回顾性研究。结果:从988名妇女中切除宫颈息肉的数量为1126。每例息肉被视为单独发作。复发率为15%。除两个(0.2%)有症状的息肉表现出高度宫颈上皮内瘤变外,所有息肉均为良性。估计带宫颈息肉的妇女(不包括出血异常和涂片异常的45岁以上妇女)去看妇科医生和组织学检查息肉的费用估计为94816.40英镑。由于宫颈息肉且没有其他临床指征,对133名妇女(14.3%)进行的评估子宫颈和/或子宫腔的进一步研究显示,没有重大病理改变,但花费41195.54英镑。结论:我们的数据不能证明无症状宫颈息肉的女性去看妇科医生。此外,不保证去除这些息肉并检查子宫腔。仅从有症状的妇女或有异常涂片的妇女中去除息肉并将组织学检查限制在这些息肉上的政策将节省大量资金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号