首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Feasibility of using wire-guided needle-knife electrocautery for refractory biliary and pancreatic strictures
【24h】

Feasibility of using wire-guided needle-knife electrocautery for refractory biliary and pancreatic strictures

机译:线引导针刀电灼治疗难治性胆胰狭窄的可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Endoscopic management of biliary or pancreatic strictures by stent insertion is well established. However, some high-grade strictures are refractory to dilation and stent placement with conventional methods. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the wire-guided electrotomy technique in dilating stiff biliary and/or pancreatic stenoses when ordinary methods failed. Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Setting: Tertiary referral university hospital. Patients: This study involved 279 patients with biliary or pancreatic strictures who underwent ERCP for stenting. Intervention: After conventional dilation failed, wire-guided needle-knife electrocautery was attempted to facilitate insertion of the dilating devices and eventually endoprosthesis. Main Outcome Measurements: The successful treatment and drainage of biliary or pancreatic strictures. Results: With wire-guided needle-knife cauterization, the success rate of stricture dilatation increased from 95.7% (267 of 279 patients) to 98.9% (276 of 279 patients). Dilation of stenoses was successful in 9 of 10 patients (90%) by using electrocautery with the wire-guided needle-knife technique. Postprocedure adverse events included self-limited bleeding, mild acute pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia, cholangitis, and biliary perforation. No procedure-related death occurred. Limitations: Retrospective, single-center study and small sample size. Conclusions: Wire-guided needle-knife electroincision appears to be effective for traversing refractory biliary or pancreatic strictures and can be considered as an alternative approach to conventional methods. However, the safety of such a technique needs to be further evaluated.
机译:背景:通过支架置入术对胆道或胰腺狭窄的内窥镜治疗已得到公认。然而,一些常规狭窄对常规方法的扩张和支架置入术是不利的。目的:评估在常规方法失败时,导线引导式电切技术在扩张硬性胆管和/或胰腺狭窄中的安全性和有效性。设计:前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析。地点:大学转诊大学医院。患者:这项研究涉及279例胆道或胰腺狭窄的患者,这些患者接受了ERCP支架置入术。干预:常规扩张失败后,尝试用线引导针刀进行电灼以促进扩张装置的插入,并最终实现内置假体。主要指标:成功治疗和引流胆管或胰腺狭窄。结果:通过线引导针刀烧灼,狭窄扩张的成功率从95.7%(279例患者中的267例)增加到98.9%(279例患者中的276例)。通过将电烙术与导线引导的针刀技术结合使用,在10名患者中有9名(90%)成功地扩张了狭窄。术后不良事件包括自限性出血,轻度急性胰腺炎,高淀粉血症,胆管炎和胆道穿孔。没有发生与手术相关的死亡。局限性:回顾性,单中心研究且样本量小。结论:导线引导式针刀电切开对于横穿难治性胆道或胰腺狭窄似乎是有效的,并且可以被认为是传统方法的替代方法。但是,这种技术的安全性需要进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号