首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Externally removable stents in the treatment of benign recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia
【24h】

Externally removable stents in the treatment of benign recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia

机译:小儿食管闭锁患者良性顽固性狭窄和食管穿孔的外部可拆式支架治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background We investigated whether removable stents, such as self-expandable plastic stents (SEPSs) and fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) could provide an alternative treatment for recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. Objective The primary aim of our study was to evaluate technical feasibility. Secondary aims were to evaluate safety and procedural success. Design Retrospective study. Setting Tertiary-care referral center. Patients A total of 24 children with EA. Interventions Retrospective review of all children with EA who underwent dilation and esophageal stent placement from January 2010 to February 2013 at our institution. Main Outcome Measurements Healing of perforation and stricture resolution at 30 and 90 days. Results A total of 41 stents (SEPSs 14, FCSEMSs 27) were placed in 24 patients with EA during the study period, including 14 who had developed esophageal leaks. Procedural success of esophageal stent placement in the treatment of refractory strictures was 39% at 30 days and 26% at 90 days. The success rate was 80% for closure of esophageal perforations with stent therapy after dilation and 25% for perforations associated with surgical repair. Adverse events of stent placement included migration (21% of SEPSs and 7% of FCSEMSs), granulation tissue (37% of FCSEMSs), and deep ulcerations (22% of FCSEMSs). Limitations Retrospective study with small sample size. Conclusion SEPSs and FCSEMSs can be placed successfully in small infants and children with a history of EA repair. The stents appear to be safe and beneficial in closing esophageal perforations, especially post-dilation. However, a high stricture recurrence rate after stent removal may limit their usefulness in treating recalcitrant esophageal anastomotic strictures.
机译:背景我们研究了可移除支架,例如自扩张塑料支架(SEPS)和完全覆盖的自扩张金属支架(FCSEMSs)是否可以为食管闭锁(EA)修复后顽固性狭窄和食管穿孔提供替代治疗。目的我们研究的主要目的是评估技术可行性。次要目标是评估安全性和程序成功性。设计回顾性研究。设置三级转诊中心。患者共有24例EA儿童。干预措施回顾性分析了从2010年1月至2013年2月在我们机构接受扩张和食管支架置入术的所有EA儿童的情况。主要结果测量30天和90天时穿孔和狭窄的愈合情况。结果在研究期间,共向24例EA患者中放置了41个支架(SEPS,14,FCSEMS 27),其中14例发生了食管渗漏。食管内支架置入术治疗难治性狭窄的手术成功率在30天时为39%,在90天时为26%。扩张后用支架疗法封闭食管穿孔的成功率为80%,而与手术修复相关的穿孔的成功率为25%。支架置入的不良事件包括迁移(SEPS占21%,FCSEMS占7%),肉芽组织(FCSEMS占37%)和深溃疡(FCSEMS占22%)。局限性回顾性研究,样本量小。结论SEPSs和FCSEMSs可成功用于有EA修复史的婴幼儿。在关闭食管穿孔,尤其是扩张后,支架似乎是安全和有益的。但是,支架去除后狭窄复发率较高,可能会限制其在治疗顽固性食管吻合口狭窄中的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号