首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Rates of screening colonoscopy are not increased when women are offered a female endoscopist in a health promotion outreach program.
【24h】

Rates of screening colonoscopy are not increased when women are offered a female endoscopist in a health promotion outreach program.

机译:如果在健康促进计划中向女性提供内镜医师,则结肠镜检查的筛查率不会增加。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In surveys, almost 50% of women prefer a female endoscopist (FE) to perform their screening colonoscopies (SCOs). OBJECTIVE: To assess whether offering women an FE is associated with higher rates of SCOs. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University of Colorado Hospital primary care clinics. PATIENTS: Women of ages 50 to 69 years eligible for an SCO. INTERVENTIONS: SCO offers through mail and telephone outreach, with and without an explicit FE option. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Outreach intervention differences in SCO completion rates and percentages of women requesting FE. RESULTS: Of 396 women, 72 (18.2%) underwent SCO without difference by type of invitation. Women who received an FE invitation were more likely to request an FE than patients who received no invitation (44.2% and 4.8%, respectively, P < .001), but women who requested an FE were not more likely to undergo an SCO than those who did not. LIMITATIONS: SCO was offered through an outreach program rather than through in-clinic referrals. The study used a nonrandomized trial comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Women offered an FE were not more likely to undergo an SCO than those who were not. This study is unique in describing outcomes associated with actual offers of an FE at the time of scheduling. More direct evidence is needed to support the notion that the absence of FEs is an important barrier to colorectal cancer screening among women.
机译:背景:在调查中,几乎50%的女性更喜欢女性内镜医师(FE)进行结肠镜检查(SCO)。目的:评估为妇女提供有限的FE是否与较高的SCO相关。设计:前瞻性队列研究。地点:科罗拉多大学医院的初级保健诊所。患者:年龄在50至69岁的女性有资格获得SCO。干预措施:SCO通过邮件和电话外联提供服务,无论是否有明确的FE选项。主要的观察指标:SCO完成率和请求FE的妇女百分比的外展干预差异。结果:在396名妇女中,有72名(18.2%)接受了SCO,但邀请类型没有差异。与没有收到邀请的女性相比,收到了邀请女性的女性更有可能要求参加女性女性(分别为44.2%和4.8%,P <.001),但是与那些没有接受女性女性的女性相比,要求参加女性女性的女性接受SCO的可能性并不高。谁没有。局限性:SCO是通过外联计划而不是通过诊所转诊提供的。该研究使用了非随机试验比较组。结论:提供FE的女性比没有接受FE的女性更有可能接受SCO。这项研究在描述与调度时的实际报价相关的结果方面是独特的。需要更直接的证据来支持以下观点:FEs的缺乏是女性大肠癌筛查的重要障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号