首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Spending less for rescuing a failed colonoscopy.
【24h】

Spending less for rescuing a failed colonoscopy.

机译:抢救失败的结肠镜检查花费更少。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I read with interest the two recent articles by Schembre et al and Keswani on how to tackle the problem of a failed regular colonoscopy procedure. Schembre et al used spiral enteroscopy as a rescue method and achieved a 92% cecal intubation rate in 24 patients. In a randomized, controlled trial of 30 patients with prior unsuccessful regular colonoscopy procedures, Keswani demonstrated that single-balloon enteroscopy was superior to repeating regular colonoscopy in achieving a higher cecal intubation rate (92.9% in single-balloon enteroscopy vs 50% in regular colonoscopy group). However, both studies failed to mention a simple and less-expensive method for dealing with this situation.
机译:我感兴趣地阅读了Schembre等人和Keswani最近发表的两篇文章,内容涉及如何解决常规结肠镜检查程序失败的问题。 Schembre等使用螺旋肠镜作为一种抢救方法,在24例患者中实现了92%的盲肠插管率。在一项对30例先前常规结肠镜检查未成功的患者进行的随机对照试验中,Keswani证明单气囊肠镜在重复盲肠插管方面要优于重复常规结肠镜检查(单气囊肠镜为92.9%,常规结肠镜检查为50%组)。但是,两项研究均未提及处理这种情况的简单且成本较低的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号