首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Nitrous oxide for analgesia in colonoscopy without sedation
【24h】

Nitrous oxide for analgesia in colonoscopy without sedation

机译:一氧化二氮用于无镇静作用的结肠镜检查镇痛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Colonoscopy is associated with pain and discomfort, and intravenous analgesics and sedatives are widely used. There are several disadvantages regarding this practice, including risk of complications, resources demanded, and amnesia after sedation. In spite of promising results in previous studies, nitrous oxide is rarely used at endoscopy centers around the world. Objective: To investigate the efficiency of nitrous oxide versus placebo as an analgesic during colonoscopy without sedation. Design: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: The endoscopy unit at Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway, between June 2006 and May 2008. Patients: This study involved patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Intervention: Patients inhaled nitrous oxide or placebo on demand. Main Outcome Measurements: The participants filled in a questionnaire regarding their experiences with the examination. Pain was graded from 1 (no pain) to 4 (severe pain). Results: We recruited 199 patients. We randomized 97 patients to the nitrous oxide group and 102 to the control group. The groups were comparable regarding demographic factors. Median patient-reported pain was 2 in both the nitrous oxide group and the control group (interquartile range 2-3 in both groups). Additional sedatives and analgesics were given equally often and in similar doses in both groups. No side effects related to administration of nitrous oxide were reported. Limitations: The questionnaire was returned by 76% of the patients. The study gas was given on demand, not continuously. Conclusion: Nitrous oxide given intermittently is not an effective substitution for intravenous on-demand sedation and analgesics in the setting of colonoscopy without sedation. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00318825.)
机译:背景:结肠镜检查与疼痛和不适有关,静脉镇痛药和镇静剂被广泛使用。这种做法有几个缺点,包括并发症风险,所需资源和镇静后遗忘症。尽管先前的研究结果令人鼓舞,但一氧化二氮很少在世界范围内的内窥镜检查中心使用。目的:研究一氧化二氮与安慰剂在无镇静作用的结肠镜检查中作为镇痛药的效率。设计:一项双盲,随机,安慰剂对照试验。地点:2006年6月至2008年5月,位于挪威奥斯陆奥斯陆大学附属医院,内窥镜科。患者:本研究涉及接受选择性结肠镜检查的患者。干预:患者可根据需要吸入一氧化二氮或安慰剂。主要结果测量:参与者填写了有关其考试经历的调查表。疼痛的评分从1(无疼痛)到4(严重疼痛)。结果:我们招募了199名患者。我们将97例患者随机分配到一氧化二氮组,将102例随机分配到对照组。两组在人口因素方面具有可比性。一氧化二氮组和对照组患者报告的疼痛中位数均为2(两组之间四分位间距为2-3)。两组均以相同剂量和相似剂量给予其他镇静剂和镇痛药。没有报告与使用一氧化二氮有关的副作用。局限性:76%的患者返回了调查表。研究气体是按需提供的,不是连续提供的。结论:在没有镇静的结肠镜检查中,间歇给予一氧化二氮不能有效替代静脉内按需镇静和镇痛药。 (临床试验注册号:NCT00318825。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号