首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Intravenous proton pump inhibition utilization and prescribing patterns escalation: a comparison between early and current trends in use.
【24h】

Intravenous proton pump inhibition utilization and prescribing patterns escalation: a comparison between early and current trends in use.

机译:静脉质子泵抑制利用和处方模式升级:早期和当前使用趋势之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Approved indications of intravenous (i.v.) proton pump inhibition (PPI) are limited to treatment of reflux esophagitis in patients unable to tolerate oral medications and for patients with pathologic hypersecretory states. OBJECTIVES: i.v. PPIs are commonly used after endoscopic evaluation of patients with high-risk endoscopic stigmata (HRES) of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (NVUGIB). There appears to have been an expansion of indications of this drug at many centers. DESIGN: All consecutive patients receiving i.v. PPI (pantoprazole) between 2 study periods, (1) when pantoprazole was restricted to the gastroenterology service and (2) when it was unrestricted, were reviewed. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: All receiving i.v. PPI. INTERVENTIONS: i.v. PPI utilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of patients receiving i.v. PPI for indications other than bleeding during 2 time periods. RESULTS: In the early period, 217 patients (67.30% male) received i.v. PPI on 218 occasions compared with 516 patients (65.31% male, P= .61) in the later period on 613 occasions. In the early group, 93.12% of 217 patients received i.v. PPI for NVUGIB compared with 56.12% of 516 patients (P< .0001) with 18% of patients receiving i.v. PPI for nothing by mouth status and 13% for abdominal pain in the later group. A total of 153 (70.18%) patients in the early group underwent upper endoscopy compared with only 275 (44.86%) patients in the later group; 84 of these 153 patients (54.90%) were already on i.v. PPI at the time of endoscopy in the early group compared with 253 (92.00%, P< .0001). CONCLUSIONS: i.v. PPI use has escalated at our hospital and is being prescribed in patients before endoscopy with fewer patients noted to have HRES on endoscopy.
机译:背景:批准的静脉(i.v.)质子泵抑制(PPI)适应症仅限于不能耐受口服药物治疗的患者和病理性分泌过多状态患者的反流性食管炎的治疗。目标:i.v。 PPI通常在对高风险内镜柱头(HRES)无静脉曲张性上消化道出血(NVUGIB)进行内镜评估后使用。在许多中心,这种药物的适应症似乎有所增加。设计:所有连续接受i.v.回顾了两个研究阶段之间的PPI(pan托拉唑),(1)当pan托拉唑仅限于胃肠病学服务时;(2)当它不受限制时。地点:三级护理大学医院。患者:所有接受i.v. PPI。干预措施: PPI利用率。主要观察指标:接受静脉输液治疗的患者百分比PPI用于2个时间段内出血以外的适应症。结果:在早期,有217例患者(男性67.30%)接受了静脉注射。 PPI为218次,后期为516次(男性为65.31%,P = .61),为613次。在早期组中,217名患者中有93.12%接受了静脉注射。 NVUGIB的PPI与516例患者中的56.12%(P <.0001)相比,18%的患者接受静脉内注射。在以后的组中,按嘴状态没有PPI,而对于腹痛则只有13%。早期组共有153例(70.18%)患者接受了上内镜检查,而晚期组只有275例(44.86%)。这153例患者中有84例(54.90%)已在静脉内。早期组内镜检查时的PPI为253(92.00%,P <.0001)。结论:i.v.在我们医院,PPI的使用已逐步增加,并且在内窥镜检查之前已向患者开出处方,而在内窥镜检查中发现HRES的患者较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号