...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Can we reduce capsule endoscopy reading times?
【24h】

Can we reduce capsule endoscopy reading times?

机译:我们可以减少胶囊内窥镜阅读时间吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Analyzing small-bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) images is time consuming.Objective: To determine the effect of reducing the number of images on reading time and interpretation of CE procedures.Design: Two techniques aimed at reducing the number of images to be viewed were studied. The number of images was reduced by removing every second image (study A) or by the Quickview mode (study B). In both studies, one endoscopist viewed the images in the conventional way, whereas another endoscopist viewed the reduced number of images.Setting: A single-center prospective study.Patients: Two hundred CE procedures, 100 consecutive procedures for each study.Main Outcome Measurements: Reading times for small-bowel images were recorded. Kappa (k) values were used to calculate interobserver agreement between viewing techniques. Diagnostic miss rates were calculated.Results: Median procedure reading times were significantly reduced by viewing half the number of images (10.2 minutes) or using the Quickview technique (4.4 minutes) compared with conventional viewing (17.0 minutes). Interobserver agreement was excellent (k = 0.91) in study A and good (k = 0.74) in study B. The diagnostic miss rate was 2% when half the number of images were viewed and 8% when the Quickview technique was used. Agreement between both techniques and conventional viewing was best when the indication for the procedure was suspected inflammatory bowel disease.Limitation: Lack of a criterion standard.Conclusions: Techniques that reduce the number of images examined in CE are time saving but are associated with considerable diagnostic miss rates. Such techniques may only be considered if inflammatory bowel disease is suspected.
机译:背景:分析小肠内窥镜检查(CE)图像非常耗时。目的:确定减少图像数量对读取时间和CE程序解释的影响设计:两种旨在减少图像数量的技术查看过的书。通过删除每隔第二张图像(研究A)或通过快速查看模式(研究B)减少了图像数量。在这两项研究中,一位内镜医师以常规方式查看图像,而另一位内镜医师则以减少的图像数量进行设置:单中心前瞻性研究患者:200例CE程序,每项研究连续100例程序主要结果测量:记录小幅图像的读取时间。卡伯(k)值用于计算观察技术之间的观察者间一致性。结果:通过查看图像数量的一半(10.2分钟)或使用Quickview技术(4.4分钟),与常规查看(17.0分钟)相比,中值程序阅读时间显着减少。在研究A中,观察者之间的一致性很好(k = 0.91),在研究B中良好(k = 0.74)。当查看一半图像数量时,诊断漏检率是2%,而使用Quickview技术时,漏检率是8%。限制因素:缺乏标准标准。结论:减少在CE中检查的图像数量的技术可节省时间,但与可观的诊断相关,这两种技术与常规观察之间的一致性最好。错过率。仅在怀疑炎症性肠病时才考虑使用此类技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号