首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Endoscopic hemostasis by using the TriClip for peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a pilot study.
【24h】

Endoscopic hemostasis by using the TriClip for peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a pilot study.

机译:通过使用TriClip进行内镜止血治疗消化性溃疡出血:一项初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the TriClip in the management of peptic ulcer hemorrhage in human beings are scarcely reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE: A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the TriClip endoscopic clipping device in the control of peptic ulcer hemorrhage. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation. SETTING: Regional government hospital. PATIENTS: From July 2004 to January 2005, patients older than 16 years and with Forrest type I and IIa peptic ulcer hemorrhages were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: TriClips were used for initial hemostasis. Salvage procedures, including adrenalin injection, heat probe application, argon plasma coagulation, or surgery will be carried out appropriately if TriClip failed to control bleeding alone. An endoscopy was repeated 24 hours later for the security of the TriClip and for any endoscopic evidence of recurrent bleeding. A follow-up endoscopy was performed 8 weeks later to assess ulcer healing.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Procedure time, successful hemostatic rate, number of clips used, ulcer recurrent bleeding rate, complications, and ulcer healing rate were measured. LIMITATIONS: No comparative arm; pilot study only. RESULT: A total of 27 cases (11 women, 16 men) were included in the study, with a median age of 70 years (range 18-88 years). There were 19 cases of duodenal ulcer and 8 cases of gastric ulcer, with median size of 8 mm (range 2-20 mm). The rate of successful hemostasis in the first endoscopy by TriClips alone was 81.5% (22/27), with a median procedure time of 10 minutes (range 3-30 minutes). In the second endoscopy, the endoscopic recurrent bleeding rate was 14.8% (4/27) and the TriClips were found dislodged in 11 patients (40.7%). The permanent hemostasis rate was 67% (18/27). The overall failure rate was 33% (9/27). Three patients required blood transfusion before the first endoscopy. There was no morbidity or mortality observed in all cases. All ulcers healed after 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the TriClip is feasible in the initial control of peptic ulcer hemorrhage. However, we could not detect any obvious advantages in arresting bleeding vessels by using this new clipping device.
机译:背景:文献中几乎没有报道TriClip在治疗人类消化性溃疡出血中的可行性,有效性和安全性。目的:进行了一项初步研究,以评估TriClip内窥镜夹持装置在控制消化性溃疡出血中的可行性,有效性和安全性。设计:前瞻性评估。地点:地方政府医院。患者:从2004年7月至2005年1月,研究纳入了16岁以上且患有Forrest I型和IIa型消化性溃疡出血的患者。干预措施:使用TriClips止血。如果TriClip无法单独控制出血,则应适当进行挽救程序,包括注射肾上腺素,应用热探针,氩气血浆凝结或手术。为确保TriClip的安全性和任何内窥镜检查证据表明反复出血,在24小时后重复进行内镜检查。主要观察指标:手术时间,止血成功率,使用的夹子数量,溃疡复发出血率,并发症和溃疡愈合率。8周后进行随访内窥镜检查以评估溃疡的愈合情况。局限性:无比较臂;仅进行初步研究。结果:总共27例(11名女性,16名男性)被纳入研究,中位年龄为70岁(范围18-88岁)。十二指肠溃疡19例,胃溃疡8例,中位大小为8 mm(范围2-20 mm)。首次使用TriClips进行首次内窥镜检查止血成功率为81.5%(22/27),中位手术时间为10分钟(范围3-30分钟)。在第二次内窥镜检查中,内窥镜复发出血率为14.8%(4/27),发现TriClips移位了11例患者(40.7%)。永久止血率为67%(18/27)。总体失败率为33%(9/27)。初次内镜检查前有三名患者需要输血。在所有病例中均未观察到发病率或死亡率。 8周后所有溃疡均he愈。结论:在初步控制消化性溃疡出血中使用TriClip是可行的。但是,使用这种新的夹持装置,我们无法在阻止出血血管方面发现任何明显的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号