首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation & the health professions >Have We Drawn the Wrong Conclusions About the Value of Care Pathways? Is a Cochrane Review Appropriate? Response to the Commentary Article Published by Kris Vanhaecht et al
【24h】

Have We Drawn the Wrong Conclusions About the Value of Care Pathways? Is a Cochrane Review Appropriate? Response to the Commentary Article Published by Kris Vanhaecht et al

机译:我们是否就护理途径的价值得出了错误的结论? Cochrane审查是否适当?对Kris Vanhaecht等发表的评论文章的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The commentary provided by Vanhaecht et al.from the European Pathways Association (EPA) questions whether conclusions derived from the review of effects of clinical pathways in hospitals are appropriate. They provide some methodological discussion that indicates a poor appreciation of the detailed content of the review as published in the Cochrane Library and a lack of understanding of the methodological requirements for complex interventions of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. In addition, Vanhaecht et al.misrepresent some important points from the review relating to the intervention reviewed. The critical commentary offered by Vanhaecht et al.is a misrepresentation of the process and content of the review and suggests they have not taken the time and effort to thoroughly read and understand this comprehensive review.
机译:欧洲途径协会(EPA)的Vanhaecht等人提供的评论质疑,对医院临床途径的影响进行回顾得出的结论是否适当。他们提供了一些方法论上的讨论,表明对Cochrane图书馆中发表的评论的详细内容缺乏理解,并且对Cochrane有效实践和护理组织(EPOC)组的复杂干预措施的方法学要求缺乏了解。此外,Vanhaecht等人在评论中还代表了与干预措施有关的一些重要观点。 Vanhaecht等人提供的批评性评论错误地描述了评审的过程和内容,表明他们没有花时间和精力来全面阅读和理解这份全面的评审。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号