...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical endocrinology and diabetes: Official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association >Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

机译:连续皮下胰岛素输注与每日多次胰岛素注射治疗2型糖尿病的比较:荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) improves HbA1c in type 1 diabetic patients unsatisfactorily controlled by Multiple Daily Injections (MDI). Few trials have explored CSII for basal-bolus therapy in type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) comparing CSII and MDI for at least 12 weeks in type 2 diabetic patients were retrieved, assessing between-group differences in HbA1c and insulin daily dose at endpoint, and incidence of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 4 RCTs was included in the analysis. CSII did not produce any significant improvement of HbA1c in comparison with MDI (Standardized difference in mean: 0.09(-0.08;0.26)%; p=0.31). No significant difference was observed in the rate of hypoglycemic episodes. CSII was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward the reduction of insulin doses used at the end of trial. CONCLUSIONS: Available data do not justify the use of CSII for basal-bolus insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes.
机译:背景:连续皮下注射胰岛素(CSII)可改善不能通过多次每日注射(MDI)控制的1型糖尿病患者的HbA1c水平。很少有试验探索CSII用于2型糖尿病的基础推注疗法。材料和方法:检索2型糖尿病患者中CSII和MDI至少12周的比较的随机临床试验(RCT),评估终点时HbA1c和胰岛素日剂量的组间差异以及低血糖发生率。结果:分析共包括4个RCT。与MDI相比,CSII并未产生HbA1c的任何显着改善(标准差的平均值为:0.09(-0.08; 0.26)%; p = 0.31)。降血糖发生率没有显着差异。 CSII与试验结束时减少胰岛素剂量的非显着趋势相关。结论:现有数据不能证明CSII用于2型糖尿病的基础推注胰岛素治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号