...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?
【24h】

Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?

机译:聋,盲或聋盲:触觉增强吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When someone looses one type of sensory input, s/he may compensate by using the sensory information conveyed by other senses. To verify whether loosing a sense or two has consequences on a spared sensory modality, namely touch, and whether these consequences depend on the type of sensory loss, we investigated the effects of deafness and blindness on temporal and spatial tactile tasks in deaf, blind and deaf-blind people. Deaf and deaf-blind people performed the spatial tactile task better than the temporal one, while blind and controls showed the opposite pattern. Deaf and deaf-blind participants were impaired in temporal discrimination as compared to controls, while deaf-blind individuals outperformed blind participants in the spatial tactile task. Overall, sensory-deprived participants did not show an enhanced tactile performance. We speculate that discriminative touch is not so relevant in humans, while social touch is. Probably, more complex tactile tasks would have revealed an increased performance in sensory-deprived people.
机译:当某人失去一种类型的感觉输入时,他/她可能会使用其他感官传达的感觉信息来进行补偿。为了验证失去一种或两种感觉是否会对剩余的感觉方式(即触摸)产生影响,以及这些影响是否取决于感觉丧失的类型,我们研究了耳聋和失明对聋,盲和聋人的时空触觉任务的影响。聋盲人。聋哑人和聋哑人在空间上的触觉任务要好于暂时性,而盲人和对照组则表现出相反的模式。与对照组相比,聋哑人和聋哑人在时间上的辨别力受损,而聋哑人在空间触觉任务上的表现优于盲人。总体而言,感觉丧失的参与者没有显示出增强的触觉表现。我们推测歧视性的触摸在人类中并没有那么重要,而社交性的触摸在人类中却是如此。也许,更复杂的触觉任务将显示出在缺乏感官的人中表现有所提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号