...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Cost-effectiveness of Using Kidneys From HCV-Viremic Donors for Transplantation Into HCV-Uninfected Recipients
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of Using Kidneys From HCV-Viremic Donors for Transplantation Into HCV-Uninfected Recipients

机译:使用来自 HCV 病毒血症供体的肾脏移植到未感染 HCV 的受体中的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Rationale Objective: Less than 4 of patients with kidney failure receive kidney transplants. Although discard rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic kidneys are declining, similar to 39 of HCV-viremic kidneys donated between 2018 and 2019 were discarded. Highly effective antiviral agents are now available to treat chronic HCV infection. Thus, our objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients. Study Design: Markov state transition decision model. Data sources include Medline search results, bibliographies from relevant English language articles, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, and the US Renal Data System. Setting Population: US patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who are on kidney transplant waiting lists. Intervention(s): Transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney versus transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney and HCV treatment. Outcomes: Effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years and costs measured in 2018 US dollars. Model, Perspective, and Timeframe: We used a health care system perspective with a lifelong time horizon. Results: In the base-case analysis, transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was more effective and less costly than transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney because of the longer waiting times for HCV-unexposed kidneys, the substantial excess mortality risk while receiving dialysis, and the high efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV infection. Transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was also preferred in sensitivity analyses of multiple model parameters. The strategy remained cost-effective unless waiting list time for an HCV-viremic kidney exceeded 3.1 years compared with the base-case value of 1.56 year. Limitations: Estimates of waiting times for patients willing to accept an HCV-viremic kidney were based on data for patients who received HCV-viremic kidney transplants. Conclusions: Transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients increased quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduced costs compared with a strategy of transplanting kidneys from HCV-unexposed donors.
机译:基本原理和目标:不到4%的肾衰竭患者接受肾移植。尽管丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)病毒血症肾脏的丢弃率正在下降,但2018年至2019年间捐献的丙型肝炎病毒血症肾脏中有39%被丢弃。现在有高效的抗病毒药物可用于治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染。因此,我们的目的是检查将肾脏从 HCV 病毒血症供体移植到未感染 HCV 的受体中的成本效益。研究设计:马尔可夫状态转移决策模型。数据来源包括Medline检索结果、相关英语文章的参考书目、移植受者科学登记处和美国肾脏数据系统。环境和人群:接受维持性血液透析的美国患者,他们在肾移植等待名单上。干预措施:使用未暴露于 HCV 的肾脏进行移植与使用 HCV 病毒血症肾脏和 HCV 治疗进行移植。结果:以质量调整生命年衡量的有效性,以 2018 年美元衡量的成本。模型、视角和时间框架:我们使用了具有终生时间范围的医疗保健系统视角。结果:在基本病例分析中,HCV病毒血症肾移植比HCV未暴露肾脏移植更有效,成本更低,因为未暴露HCV的肾脏等待时间更长,接受透析时有相当大的超额死亡风险,以及直接作用抗病毒药物对HCV感染的高效。在多个模型参数的敏感性分析中,HCV 病毒血症肾移植也是首选。除非HCV病毒血症肾的等待时间超过3.1年,而基准值为1.56年,否则该策略仍然具有成本效益。局限性:愿意接受HCV病毒血症肾的患者的等待时间估计基于接受HCV病毒血症肾移植的患者的数据。结论:与从未暴露于HCV的供体移植肾脏的策略相比,将HCV病毒血症供体的肾脏移植到未感染HCV的受体中可延长质量调整后的预期寿命并降低成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号