...
首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Growing Region Segmentation Software (GRES) for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of multiple sclerosis: intra- and inter-observer agreement variability: a comparison with manual contouring method.
【24h】

Growing Region Segmentation Software (GRES) for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of multiple sclerosis: intra- and inter-observer agreement variability: a comparison with manual contouring method.

机译:用于多发性硬化症定量磁共振成像的生长区域分割软件(GRES):观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性差异:与手动轮廓绘制方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lesion area measurement in multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the key points in evaluating the natural history and in monitoring the efficacy of treatments. This study was performed to check the intra- and inter-observer agreement variability of a locally developed Growing Region Segmentation Software (GRES), comparing them to those obtained using manual contouring (MC). From routine 1.5-T MRI study of clinically definite multiple sclerosis patients, 36 lesions seen on proton-density-weighted images (PDWI) and 36 enhancing lesion on Gd-DTPA-BMA-enhanced T1-weighted images (Gd-T1WI) were randomly chosen and were evaluated by three observers. The mean range of lesion size was 9.9-536.0 mm(2) on PDWI and 3.6-57.2 mm(2) on Gd-T1WI. The median intra- and inter-observer agreement were, respectively, 97.1 and 90.0% using GRES on PDWI, 81.0 and 70.0% using MC on PDWI, 88.8 and 80.0% using GRES on Gd-T1WI, and 85.8 and 70.0% using MC on Gd-T1WI. The intra- and inter-observer agreements were significantly greater for GRES compared with MC ( P<0.0001 and P=0.0023, respectively) for PDWI, while no difference was found between GRES an MC for Gd-T1WI. The intra-observer variability for GRES was significantly lower on both PDWI ( P=0.0001) and Gd-T1WI ( P=0.0067), whereas for MC the same result was found only for PDWI ( P=0.0147). These data indicate that GRES reduces both the intra- and the inter-observer variability in assessing the area of MS lesions on PDWI and may prove useful in multicentre studies.
机译:多发性硬化症(MS)的病变面积测量是评估自然病史和监测治疗效果的关键点之一。进行这项研究是为了检查观察者之间和观察者之间的协议差异,这些差异是与本地开发的生长区域分割软件(GRES)进行比较的,与使用手动轮廓绘制(MC)获得的结果的比较。从临床明确的多发性硬化症患者的常规1.5-T MRI研究中,随机在质子密度加权图像(PDWI)上看到36个病变,在Gd-DTPA-BMA增强的T1加权图像(Gd-T1WI)上看到36个增强病变选择并由三位观察员进行评估。病变大小的平均范围在PDWI上为9.9-536.0 mm(2),在Gd-T1WI上为3.6-57.2 mm(2)。观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性分别为:PDWI上使用GRES的分别为97.1%和90.0%,PDWI上使用MC的分别为81.0和70.0%,Gd-T1WI上使用GRES的分别为88.8和80.0%和MC分别为85.8和70.0% Gd-T1WI。与PDWI的MC相比,GRES的观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性显着更高(分别为P <0.0001和P = 0.0023),而Gd-T1WI的GRES和MC之间没有发现差异。在PDWI(P = 0.0001)和Gd-T1WI(P = 0.0067)上,GRES的观察者内变异性均显着较低,而对于MC,仅PDWI(P = 0.0147)发现了相同的结果。这些数据表明,在评估PDWI上MS病变的区域时,GRES减少了观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性,可能在多中心研究中被证明是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号