首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Bet 3: In a penetrating chest wound is a three-sided dressing or a one-way chest seal better at preventing respiratory complications?
【24h】

Bet 3: In a penetrating chest wound is a three-sided dressing or a one-way chest seal better at preventing respiratory complications?

机译:赌注3:在穿透性的胸部伤口中,三面敷料或单向胸封是否更好地预防了呼吸系统并发症?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A short-cut review was carried out to establish whether the traditional three-sided dressing is better than a one-way chest seal at preventing the respiratory complications from penetrating chest trauma. Only one animal study, two guidelines and two case reports provided published evidence relevant to the question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. The clinical bottom line is that there is very little evidence, but that the one-way seals may have practical advantages, particularly in the out-of-hospital setting.
机译:进行了捷径审查,以确认传统的三面敷料在预防呼吸系统并发症穿透胸外伤方面是否优于单向胸封。只有一项动物研究,两项指南和两个病例报告提供了与该问题有关的已公开证据。这些论文的作者,出版日期和国家,研究的患者组,研究类型,相关结果,结果和研究缺点均列于表格中。临床上的底线是几乎没有证据,但是单向密封可能具有实际优势,尤其是在院外环境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号