...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.
【24h】

Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.

机译:曼彻斯特分诊系统在荷兰普通急诊科患者中的可靠性和有效性:模拟研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) in a general emergency department patient population. METHODS: A prospective evaluation study was conducted in two general hospitals in the Netherlands. Emergency department nurses from both hospitals triaged 50 patient vignettes into one of five triage categories in the MTS. Triage ratings were compared with the ratings of two Dutch MTS experts to measure inter-rater reliability. Nineteen days after triaging the patient vignettes, triage nurses were asked to rate the same vignettes again to measure test-retest reliability. Reliability in relation to the work experience of emergency department nurses was also studied. Validity was assessed by calculating percentages for overtriage, undertriage, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was substantial reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.75 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.77)). No significant association was found between the experience of emergency department nurses and the reliability score (kappa). Undertriage occurred more frequently than overtriage, especially in elderly patients (25.3% vs 7.6%). Sensitivity for urgent patients in the MTS was 53.2% and specificity was 95.1%. The patient vignettes representing children aged 16 years revealed a higher sensitivity (83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater reliability is "moderate" to substantial not influenced by nurses' work experience. Undertriage mainly occurs in the MTS categories orange and yellow. The MTS is more sensitive for children who need immediate or urgent care than for other patients in the emergency department.
机译:目的:评估曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)在普通急诊科患者人群中的可靠性和有效性。方法:在荷兰的两家综合医院进行了一项前瞻性评估研究。两家医院的急诊科护士将MTS中的50个病人渐晕分为五个分类类别之一。将分诊评分与两名荷兰MTS专家的评分进行比较,以评估评分者之间的可靠性。在对患者晕影进行分类后的19天,要求分类护士对同一晕影进行再次评分,以测量重测信度。还研究了与急诊科护士工作经验相关的可靠性。通过计算过度分类,分类不足,敏感性和特异性的百分比来评估有效性。结果:评分者间的信度是很高的信度(类内相关系数为0.75(95%CI为0.72至0.77))。急诊科护士的经验与可靠性得分(kappa)之间没有显着关联。检举不足发生率高于检举过度发生率,特别是在老年患者中(25.3%vs 7.6%)。 MTS中紧急患者的敏感性为53.2%,特异性为95.1%。代表年龄小于16岁的儿童的小插图显示出更高的敏感性(83.3%)。结论:评价者间的可靠性是“中等”的,基本上不受护士工作经验的影响。不足类别主要发生在MTS类别的橙色和黄色中。与需要急诊护理的儿童相比,MTS对急诊儿童的敏感性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号