首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of powers ratio for assessment of atlanto-occipital junction: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography.
【24h】

Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of powers ratio for assessment of atlanto-occipital junction: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography.

机译:观察者之间的可靠性和观察者内部的能力比用于评估寰枕连接:平片和计算机断层扫描的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Powers ratio, as assessed on plain radiographs or computed tomography (CT) images, appears to have clinical and prognostic value. To date, the validation of this assessment tool has been limited to a small number of observers at a single site. No study has examined the intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the Powers ratio measurement on plain radiographs or CT images among a large cohort of spine surgeons. This type of validation is critical to allow for the broader use of the Powers ratio methodology in research studies and clinical applications. Plain radiographs and spiral CT images of the cervical spine of 32 patients were assessed, and the Powers ratio was determined by five spine surgeons. Each surgeon performed three readings, 7 months apart. In the first round of measurements, the observers used only the Powers' method of instruction. The second and third measurement sets were obtained after an interactive teaching session on the methodology. The order of the images was altered for the second and third set of measurements. The coefficient of variation (Cv) was calculated to determine the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reliability for each imaging technique. A Bland-Altman plot was then used to assess the agreement between the two imaging techniques. For interobserver reliability, the mean Cv of the Powers ratio was 9.09 and 4.31% for plain radiographs and CT, respectively. The Cv mean value for intraobserver reproducibility averaged 4.95% (range 1.39-9.08) when CT scans were used and 14.17% (range 7.54-34.30) when plain radiographs were used. For intraobserver reproducibility, the lowest and highest Cv mean value of five raters was 1.39 and 9.08% using CT scans and 7.54 and 34.3% using plain radiographs. The Bland-Altman plot, demonstrated that the two methods were in close agreement on the -0.8 and 0.89% interval for limits of agreement (bias +/- 1.96sigma). The intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of Powers ratio measurement was acceptable (<5%) with CT scans but not with plain radiographs. However, despite the statistically inferior reliability and repeatability, the Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that given the -0.8 and 0.89% limits of agreement, the two methods may be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
机译:如在平片或计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上评估的功效比,似乎具有临床和预后价值。迄今为止,该评估工具的验证仅限于单个站点上的少量观察员。尚无研究检查大型队列外科医生在平片或X射线照片上的功率比测量值的观察者内可重复性和观察者间可靠性。这种类型的验证对于在研究和临床应用中广泛使用Powers比率方法至关重要。评估了32例颈椎的X线平片和螺旋CT图像,并由五名脊柱外科医生确定了Powers比。每个外科医生执行三个读数,相隔7个月。在第一轮测量中,观察者仅使用Powers的教学方法。在方法论的互动式教学之后,获得了第二套和第三套测量值。对于第二组和第三组测量,图像的顺序已更改。计算变异系数(Cv)以确定每种成像技术的观察者内重复性和观察者间可靠性。然后使用Bland-Altman图来评估两种成像技术之间的一致性。对于观察者间的可靠性,平片和CT的Powers比的平均Cv分别为9.09和4.31%。使用CT扫描时,观察者内部再现性的Cv平均值平均为4.95%(范围1.39-9.08),使用普通X射线照片时,Cv平均值为14.17%(范围7.54-34.30)。对于观察者内的可重复性,使用CT扫描时,五个评估者的最低和最高Cv平均值分别为1.39和9.08%,而使用平片检查则分别为7.54和34.3%。 Bland-Altman图表明,这两种方法在-0.8和0.89%的一致性极限区间(偏差+/- 1.96sigma)上非常一致。功率比测量的观察者内再现性和观察者间可靠性在CT扫描中可接受(<5%),但在普通X射线照片上则不可接受。但是,尽管统计和可靠性均较差,但Bland-Altman图分析表明,在-0.8和0.89%的一致性限制下,这两种方法在临床实践中可以互换使用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号