首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >How do validated measures of functional outcome compare with commonly used outcomes in administrative database research for lumbar spinal surgery?
【24h】

How do validated measures of functional outcome compare with commonly used outcomes in administrative database research for lumbar spinal surgery?

机译:经验证的功能结局指标与腰椎手术行政数据库研究中常用结局指标如何比较?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Clinical interpretation of health services research based on administrative databases is limited by the lack of patient-reported functional outcome measures. Reoperation, as a surrogate measure for poor outcome, may be biased by preferences of patients and surgeons and may even be planned a priori. Other available administrative data outcomes, such as postoperative cross sectional imaging (PCSI), may better reflect changes in functional outcome. The purpose was to determine if postoperative events captured from administrative databases, namely reoperation and PCSI, reflect outcomes as derived by validated functional outcome measures (short form 36 scores, Oswestry disability index) for patients who underwent discretionary surgery for specific degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine such as disc herniation, spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and isthmic spondylolisthesis. After reviewing the records of all patients surgically treated for disc herniation, spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and isthmic spondylolisthesis at our institution, we recorded the occurrence of PCSI (MRI or CT-myelograms) and reoperations, as well as demographic, surgical, and functional outcome data. We determined how early (within 6 months) and intermediate (within 18 months) term events (PCSI and reoperations) were associated with changes in intermediate (minimum 1 year) and late (minimum 2 years) term functional outcome, respectively. We further evaluated how early (6-12 months) and intermediate (12-24 months) term changes in functional outcome were associated with the subsequent occurrence of intermediate (12-24 months) and late (beyond 24 months) term adverse events, respectively. From 148 surgically treated patients, we found no significant relationship between the occurrence of PCSI or reoperation and subsequent changes in functional outcome at intermediate or late term. Similarly, earlier changes in functional outcome did not have any significant relationship with subsequent occurrences of adverse events at intermediate or late term. Although it may be tempting to consider administrative database outcome measures as proxies for poor functional outcome, we cannot conclude that a significant relationship exists between the occurrence of PCSI or reoperation and changes in functional outcome.
机译:由于缺乏患者报告的功能结局指标,基于行政数据库的卫生服务研究的临床解释受到限制。再次手术,作为不良结果的替代指标,可能会因患者和外科医生的偏爱而有所偏差,甚至可能事先进行计划。其他可用的行政数据结果,例如术后横截面成像(PCSI),可能会更好地反映功能结果的变化。目的是确定从行政数据库中捕获的术后事件(即再次手术和PCSI)是否反映了针对腰部特定退行性疾病而进行了酌情手术的患者通过经过验证的功能结果指标(简短形式36评分,Oswestry残疾指数)得出的结果椎间盘突出症,脊柱狭窄,退行性腰椎滑脱和峡部型腰椎滑脱等脊柱。在回顾了所有在我们机构接受过椎间盘突出症,脊柱狭窄,退行性脊柱滑脱和峡部脊柱滑脱手术治疗的患者的记录后,我们记录了PCSI(MRI或CT脊髓造影)的发生情况和再次手术的情况,以及人口统计学,外科手术和功能结果数据。我们确定了早期(6个月以内)和中期(18个月以内)足月事件(PCSI和再次手术)与中期(最少1年)和晚期(最少2年)功能变化的相关性。我们进一步评估了功能结局的早期(6-12个月)和中期(12-24个月)变化与随后发生的中期(12-24个月)和晚期(超过24个月)不良事件如何相关。从148例接受手术治疗的患者中,我们发现PCSI的发生或再次手术与中期或晚期的后续功能结局变化之间无显着相关性。同样,功能结局的早期变化与中期或晚期不良事件的后续发生没有明显关系。尽管将管理数据库结果度量视为不良功能结果的代理可能很诱人,但我们不能得出结论,PCSI发生或再手术与功能结果变化之间存在显着关系。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号