首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Have we really abandoned open simple prostatectomy today?
【24h】

Have we really abandoned open simple prostatectomy today?

机译:我们今天真的放弃了简单的开放式前列腺切除术吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the standard surgical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with prostate sizes of 30-80 g [1]. In cases with large prostate adenomas (>80g), the resection time required by TURP is associated with increased risk of transurethral resection syndrome, blood loss, and other complications [1,2]. Open prostatectomy (OP) is therefore still considered a valid option for patients with prostates >100 g [1,3].
机译:经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)仍然是由于前列腺肥大(BPH)引起的膀胱出口阻塞(BOO)继发的下尿路症状的标准手术疗法,前列腺大小为30-80 g [1]。在大前列腺腺瘤(> 80g)的情况下,TURP要求的切除时间与经尿道切除综合征,失血和其他并发症的风险增加有关[1,2]。因此,对于前列腺> 100 g的患者,仍然认为开放式前列腺切除术(OP)是有效的选择[1,3]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号