首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Additional Analysis of the Secondary End Point of Biochemical Recurrence Rate in a Phase 3 Trial (CS21) Comparing Degarelix 80 mg Versus Leuprolide in Prostate Cancer Patients Segmented by Baseline Characteristics
【24h】

Additional Analysis of the Secondary End Point of Biochemical Recurrence Rate in a Phase 3 Trial (CS21) Comparing Degarelix 80 mg Versus Leuprolide in Prostate Cancer Patients Segmented by Baseline Characteristics

机译:根据基线特征比较前列腺癌患者中Degarelix 80 mg与Leuprolide的Degarelix 80 mg比较的3期试验(CS21)中生化复发率次要终点的其他分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Recent data suggest prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression may predict overall survival in prostate cancer patients. Objective: To compare the activity of degarelix and leuprolide regarding PSA recurrence-free survival. Design, setting, and participants: Phase 3, 1-yr, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial comparing the efficacy and safety of degarelix at 240 mg for 1 mo, and then 80 mg monthly (240/80 mg); degarelix at 240 mg for 1 mo, and then 160 mg monthly; and leuprolide at 7.5 mg/mo. Overall, 610 patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages), for whom androgen deprivation therapy was indicated, were included. The primary end point of this trial has been reported previously; the protocolled and exploratory subgroup analyses reported in this paper focus on degarelix at 240/80 mg (dose approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Evaluation Association for the treatment of patients with hormone-naive advanced prostate cancer). Measurements: PSA progression-free survival (two consecutive increases in PSA of 50% compared with nadir and >5 ng/ml on two consecutive measurements at least 2 wk apart or death) and change in PSA were reviewed. Effects of baseline disease stage (localised, locally advanced, and metastatic) and PSA level (<10, 10-20, >20-50, and >50 ng/ml) were analysed. Results and limitations: Patients receiving degarelix showed a significantly lower risk of PSA progression or death compared with leuprolide (p = 0.05). PSA recurrences occurred mainly in patients with advanced disease and exclusively in those with baseline PSA >20 ng/ml. Patients with PSA >20 ng/ml had a significantly longer time to PSA recurrence with degarelix (p = 0.04). The relatively low number of patients in each subgroup is a limitation of this study. Conclusions: These results generate the hypothesis that degarelix at 240/80 mg offers improved PSA control compared with leuprolide. PSA recurrences occurred almost exclusively in patients with metastatic prostate cancer or high baseline PSA during this 1-yr study. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
机译:背景:最新数据表明前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的进展可能预示着前列腺癌患者的总体生存。目的:比较地加瑞克和亮丙瑞林对PSA无复发生存的作用。设计,背景和参与者:3年期,1年,多中心,随机,开放标签的试验,比较了地加瑞克在240毫克下1个月,然后每月80毫克(240/80毫克)的有效性和安全性;地加瑞克240毫克/ 1个月,然后每月160毫克;和亮丙瑞林,剂量为7.5 mg / mo。总体上,包括610例经组织学证实为前列腺癌的患者(所有阶段),其中有雄激素剥夺治疗的患者。该试验的主要终点先前已有报道;本文报道的协议性和探索性亚组分析集中于240/80 mg地加瑞克(美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲医学评估协会批准的剂量,用于治疗初次使用激素的晚期前列腺癌患者)。测量:PSA无进展生存期(两次相距至少2周或死亡的连续两次PSA较最低点连续增加50%,> 5 ng / ml)和PSA的变化。分析基线疾病阶段(局部,局部晚期和转移性)和PSA水平(<10、10-20,> 20-50和> 50 ng / ml)的影响。结果与局限性:与地丙瑞林相比,接受地加瑞克治疗的患者PSA进展或死亡的风险显着降低(p = 0.05)。 PSA复发主要发生在患有晚期疾病的患者中,并且仅发生在基线PSA> 20 ng / ml的患者中。 PSA> 20 ng / ml的患者使用地加瑞克进行PSA复发的时间明显更长(p = 0.04)。每个亚组的患者相对较少是该研究的局限性。结论:这些结果产生了这样的假设:与亮丙瑞林相比,地加瑞克240/80 mg可以改善PSA控制。在这项为期1年的研究中,PSA复发几乎仅发生在转移性前列腺癌或基线PSA高的患者中。有必要做进一步的研究来证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号