首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: forty years of competition--which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: forty years of competition--which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:coronary动脉与大隐静脉导管在冠状动脉搭桥手术中的应用:长达40年的竞争-哪种导管能提供更好的通畅性?系统的审查和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The internal thoracic artery is the most effective conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery; however, most patients have multivessel disease and require additional saphenous vein or radial artery grafts. In this systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, we aim to compare reported patency rates for these conduits and explore if differences are homogeneous across follow-up intervals. A literature search was performed using Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and randomised controlled trial databases to identify studies published between 1965 and October 2009. All studies reporting angiographic comparison of saphenous vein and radial artery conduit patency were included, irrespective of language. The end point was angiographic graft patency stratified over different follow-up intervals. Meta-analysis was performed according to recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. We used a random-effect model and the odds ratio as the summary statistic. A total of 35 studies were identified. They reported early patency (5 years, 1157 grafts). Significant variation of comparative patency existed across different follow-up intervals. Early saphenous vein patency was similar to radial artery patency with odds ratio of 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.68-1.61). Medium-term saphenous vein patency, however, deteriorated significantly (odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.29-3.29). Similarly, long-term patency was better for radial artery conduits (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.32-3.94). Heterogeneity was due to angiographic patency characteristics and related to risk of bias. In conclusion, the findings of this systematic review of the published literature and meta-analysis support the use of radial artery in preference to saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery.
机译:胸内动脉是冠状动脉搭桥手术最有效的导管。但是,大多数患者患有多支血管疾病,需要额外的大隐静脉或radial动脉移植。在对文献和荟萃分析的系统综述中,我们旨在比较这些导管的通畅率,并探讨在随访间隔中差异是否均一。使用Embase,Medline,Cochrane图书馆,Google Scholar和随机对照试验数据库进行文献检索,以鉴定1965年至2009年10月之间发表的研究。所有报告的隐性静脉造影和conduit动脉导管通畅的血管造影比较均包括在内,不论语言如何。终点是在不同的随访间隔内分层进行血管造影的通畅性。根据流行病学指南的Cochrane协作和观察性研究的荟萃分析的建议进行荟萃分析。我们使用随机效应模型和优势比作为摘要统计量。总共确定了35项研究。他们报告了早期通畅( 5年,1157根移植物)。在不同的随访间隔中,比较通畅性存在显着差异。早期大隐静脉通畅与radial动脉通畅相似,比值比为1.04(95%置信区间0.68-1.61)。然而,中期大隐静脉通畅性显着恶化(几率2.06,95%置信区间1.29-3.29)。同样,radial动脉导管的长期通畅性更好(几率2.28,95%置信区间1.32-3.94)。异质性是由于血管造影通畅性特征和与偏倚风险有关。总之,对已发表文献和荟萃分析进行系统综述的结果支持coronary动脉优先于大隐静脉导管进行冠状动脉搭桥手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号