...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of wildlife research >Longevity and migration distance differ between wild and hand-reared mallards Anas platyrhynchos in Northern Europe
【24h】

Longevity and migration distance differ between wild and hand-reared mallards Anas platyrhynchos in Northern Europe

机译:北欧野生和人工饲养的野鸭Anas platyrhynchos的寿命和迁徙距离不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The mallard Anas platyrhynchos is the world's most widespread and numerous dabbling duck. It is also farmed and released to the wild by the millions each year, but the effects of this on wild populations remain little studied. By using historical national ringing-recovery data from Sweden and Finland, we here address three predictions based on previous studies: (1) longevity is higher in wild than in hand-reared mallards, (2) wild mallards migrate longer than hand-reared, and (3) migration distance in wild ducks surviving long enough to start fall migration has decreased over the last 50 years. Indeed, wild mallards lived longer than hand-reared (19 versus 9 months in Swedish birds and 13 versus 4 months in Finnish birds). Compared to wild mallards,a smaller proportion of hand-reared birds survived long enough to have the chance to enter the wild breeding population; less than 25 % of the Swedish birds and less than 10 % of the Finnish birds lived a year or longer. Wild birds migrated farther thanhand-reared (mean distance in Swedish birds, 676 versus 523 km; in Finnish birds, 1,213 versus 157 km), a pattern caused by both shorter life span and lower migration speed in hand-reared birds. Mean migration distance in wild Swedish mallards was 787 km in 1947-1972 but 591 km in 1977-1993. This difference was not statistically significant, though, possibly due to the limited sample size and lack of data from the last two decades. In general, our study provides a conservative test of the predictions addressed, calling for more research about the consequences of restocking duck populations.
机译:绿头野鸭Anas platyrhynchos是世界上分布最广,数量最多的da鸭。每年也有数百万人将其养殖并释放到野外,但是这对野生种群的影响仍然很少研究。通过使用瑞典和芬兰的全国响铃恢复历史数据,我们在此基础上根据先前的研究得出了三个预测:(1)野生野鸭的寿命长于人工饲养的野鸭,(2)野生野鸭的迁移时间长于人工饲养的野鸭, (3)在过去的50年中,存活时间足够长以开始秋季迁徙的野鸭的迁徙距离已有所减少。的确,野生野鸭的寿命比人工饲养的寿命长(瑞典鸟类为19个月对9个月,芬兰鸟类为13个月对4个月)。与野生野鸭相比,较少的人工饲养的鸟类存活时间足够长,有机会进入野生繁殖种群。不到25%的瑞典鸟类和不到10%的芬兰鸟类生活了一年或更长时间。野生鸟类的迁移比人工饲养的鸟类迁移的距离要长(瑞典鸟类的平均距离为676公里对523公里;芬兰鸟类的平均距离为1,213对157公里),这是由于人工饲养的鸟类寿命较短和迁移速度较低而引起的。 1947-1972年,瑞典野生野鸭的平均迁移距离为787公里,而1977-1993年为591公里。但是,这种差异在统计上并不显着,可能是由于样本数量有限以及最近二十年来缺乏数据所致。总的来说,我们的研究对所预测的结果进行了保守检验,要求对放养鸭种群的后果进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号