首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer has no benefits on overall survival or on the mastectomy rate in routine clinical practice. A population-based study with a median follow-up of 11 years using propensity score matching
【24h】

Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer has no benefits on overall survival or on the mastectomy rate in routine clinical practice. A population-based study with a median follow-up of 11 years using propensity score matching

机译:在常规临床实践中,乳腺癌的新辅助疗法对总体生存率或乳房切除术率无益处。一项基于人群的研究,使用倾向评分匹配,中位随访11年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Even though neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown no benefits on overall survival (OS), it is being widely used in the treatment of breast cancer. This is based on the assumption that it may diminish the mastectomy rate and therefore be clinically relevant for patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on OS and on the rate of mastectomy in patients with non-metastatic primary operable breast carcinoma in routine practice. Methods: The Cote d'Or district breast cancer registry was used to analyse the OS and mastectomy rate in patients with invasive primary operable unilateral breast cancer diagnosed between 1982 and 2006. We performed Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analyses for OS and multivariate logistic regression for the mastectomy rate for the overall population. Different matching methods based on the propensity score were used as sensitivity analyses to ensure that corrections for selection bias were adequate. Results: We analysed 1578 patients, among whom 174 had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 11.1 years. There was no difference between the two treatment groups for OS (HR = 1.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-1.51 for neoadjuvant chemotherapy)). The mastectomy rate was higher among patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 1.54 (95% CI: 1.03-2.31)). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results: for OS, there was no difference between the two populations precisely matched using propensity scores (HR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.671-1.65). Conclusion: Despite long term follow-up, neoadjuvant chemotherapy provided no benefit for either OS or the mastectomy rate in our population.
机译:背景:即使新辅助化疗对总体生存率(OS)并未显示出任何益处,但仍被广泛用于治疗乳腺癌。这是基于这样的假设,即它可能会降低乳房切除术的比率,因此在临床上与患者相关。我们的目标是评估常规实践中新辅助化疗对非转移性原发性可手术乳腺癌患者OS的影响以及对乳房切除术的影响。方法:使用Cote d'Or区乳腺癌登记系统分析1982年至2006年诊断为浸润性原发性可手术性单侧乳腺癌的患者的OS和乳房切除率。我们对OS和多因素Logistic进行了Cox比例风险比(HR)分析总体人群乳房切除率的回归。基于倾向得分的不同匹配方法用作敏感性分析,以确保对选择偏差的校正足够。结果:我们分析了1578例患者,其中174例接受了新辅助化疗。中位随访时间为11。1年。两组的OS差异无统计学意义(HR = 1.08(95%置信区间(CI):新辅助化疗为0.77-1.51))。在接受新辅助化疗的患者中,乳房切除术的比率更高(赔率比为1.54(95%CI:1.03-2.31))。敏感性分析证实了这些结果:对于OS,使用倾向评分(HR 1.08; 95%CI:0.671-1.65)精确匹配的两个人群之间没有差异。结论:尽管进行了长期随访,但新辅​​助化疗对我们的人群的OS或乳房切除率均无益处。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号