...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery >Commentary on 'Systematic review and meta-analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta'
【24h】

Commentary on 'Systematic review and meta-analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta'

机译:关于“腹主动脉腹膜后与经腹膜方式的系统评价和荟萃分析”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the last few decades the classical open surgical approach for infra-renal aneurysm repair has not undergone major changes. The principle of exposing the aorta, clamping it, and sewing in a vascular graft has not changed significantly. In this meta-analysis, the auteurs claim there may be clinical benefits to performing this surgery via a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. The reduction in mortality of elective infra-renal repairs has been substantial since it was developed. However, this reduction is a result of several factors, such as patient selection, medical treatment, aesthetic techniques, and improved care in intensive care units, and not the surgical technique perse.
机译:在过去的几十年中,用于肾下动脉瘤修复的经典开放式手术方法并未发生重大变化。暴露主动脉,夹紧主动脉并在血管移植物中缝合的原理没有明显改变。在这项荟萃分析中,预言者声称通过腹膜后(RP)方法进行该手术可能具有临床益处。自从开发以来,选择性肾下修复的死亡率已大大降低。但是,这种减少是多种因素的结果,例如患者选择,药物治疗,美学技术以及重症监护室中改善的护理,而不是手术技术本身。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号