【24h】

Cost comparison study of two different follow-up protocols after surgery for oesophageal cancer.

机译:食管癌手术后两种不同随访方案的费用比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Costs of follow-up strategies in patients after surgery for oesophageal cancer have not been evaluated. We therefore randomised 109 patients to standard outpatient clinic follow-up by a surgeon (n=55) or home visits by a specialist nurse (n=54) and compared costs between these two strategies. METHOD: Cost comparisons included comprehensive data on hospital costs, diagnostic interventions and extramural care. Detailed information on health care consumption was obtained from a case record form at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation. RESULTS: Total medical costs were lower for nurse-led follow-up (euro 2592 versus euro 3798) than standard follow-up, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.11). This advantage in the nurse-led follow-up group was mainly due to lower costs for follow-up visits (euro 234 versus euro 503; p<0.001), and a trend towards lower costs for total intramural care (euro 1477 versus euro 2277; p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal cancer surgery is likely to be cost effective and may even generate cost savings. The results of this study further support a specific role of nurses in the medical care of patients with malignant diseases.
机译:背景与目的:尚未评估食管癌手术后患者随访策略的费用。因此,我们将109名患者随机分配给外科医生进行标准门诊随访(n = 55)或由专科护士进行家访(n = 54),并比较了这两种策略之间的费用。方法:费用比较包括有关医院费用,诊断干预措施和壁外护理的综合数据。随机分配后第6周,第3、6、9和12个月的病例记录表提供了有关医疗保健消费的详细信息。结果:由护士主导的随访的总医疗费用(欧元2592对比欧元3798)比标准随访要低,尽管这种差异在统计学上并不显着(p = 0.11)。由护士领导的随访组的这一优势主要是由于随访费用较低(234欧元对503欧元; p <0.001),以及总体壁内护理费用较低的趋势(1477欧元对2277欧元) ; p = 0.19)。结论:食管癌手术后由护士领导的患者随访可能具有成本效益,甚至可以节省成本。这项研究的结果进一步支持了护士在恶性疾病患者医疗护理中的特殊作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号