首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin OEPP: = EPPO Bulletin >Enhancements of pest risk analysis techniques: Contribution to Work Package 3: enhancing techniques for standardising and summarising pest risk assessments - review of best practice in enhancing consistency
【24h】

Enhancements of pest risk analysis techniques: Contribution to Work Package 3: enhancing techniques for standardising and summarising pest risk assessments - review of best practice in enhancing consistency

机译:增强有害生物风险分析技术:对工作包3的贡献:增强标准化和汇总有害生物风险评估的技术-审查提高一致性的最佳做法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

International, regional and national standards for plant health pest risk assessment and examples of their use from countries around the globe were examined together with similar documents from related fields such as animal health, nature conservationand genetically modified organism (GMO) assessment to determine how the consistency of assessing risk, or components of risk, within and between assessments is addressed. A range of approaches was identified that could be adopted and adapted for use ina revised decision support scheme for quarantine pests by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) to aid consistency. No single scheme contained a mechanism to ensure or guarantee consistency and no single scheme contained allof the approaches identified to maximize consistency. If the approach of using a five division scale to describe individual components that contribute to evaluating the overall pest risk is to be maintained in the EPPO scheme, then the primary needs required in the EPPO scheme to enhance consistency are (i) the provision of examples that describe divisions within the scales, or alternative but equivalent descriptors that allow assessors to distinguish between divisions, and (ii) a mechanism to combinerisk elements in a consistent and transparent way. Features that would help inexperienced assessors include a clear structure, clear rating guidance, questions posed unambiguously, provision of standardized answers and an easily applicable method to interpret and summarize risk ratings. Beyond improvements to the EPPO scheme, assessors using the scheme will need training. Providing links to information and suggesting data sources that would help assessors answer questions would also be helpful (this isbeing addressed in Work Package 1 of PRATIQUE).
机译:对植物健康有害生物风险评估的国际,区域和国家标准及其在全球范围内使用的示例进行了研究,并与相关领域(如动物健康,自然保护和转基因生物(GMO)评估)的类似文件进行了研究,以确定一致性评估内部和评估之间评估风险或风险组成部分的方法。欧洲和地中海植物保护组织(EPPO)确定了可以采用和修改为检疫性有害生物决策支持计划的一系列方法,以帮助保持一致性。没有一个单一的方案包含确保或保证一致性的机制,也没有一个单一的方案包含确定为最大化一致性的所有方法。如果要在EPPO计划中维持使用五划分量表来描述有助于评估总体有害生物风险的单个成分的方法,那么EPPO计划中为提高一致性而需要的主要需求是(i)提供示例描述量表中的划分,或允许评估者区分划分的替代但等效的描述符,以及(ii)以一致和透明的方式组合风险要素的机制。可以帮助缺乏经验的评估人员的功能包括清晰的结构,清晰的评级指南,明确提出的问题,提供标准答案以及易于解释和总结风险评级的方法。除了改进EPPO计划外,使用该计划的评估师还需要培训。提供信息链接并建议数据源以帮助评估者回答问题也将有所帮助(这在PRATIQUE的工作包1中已解决)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号