【24h】

History repeating itself: provincialism in emergency medicine

机译:历史重演:急诊医学中的省主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I read with great interest, Patrick Plunkett's recent editorial, 'Evolution - a slow and eventful process' . His reference to recent attempts by European anesthesiologists to develop a 'core curriculum' for emergency medicine as a subspecialty of anesthesiology repeats similar events in the United States 30-40 years ago . A remarkable book by Brian Zink chronicles the history of emergency medicine in the United States, and includes brief references to conflicts with other specialties who felt they 'owned' all or part of emergency medicine .In the early days, the establishment of emergency medicine residency programs at many academic institutions often faced the hurdle of surgeons or internists who managed 'emergency rooms.' They often served as triage agents, consulting other services for primary care in areas where they lacked familiarity. In many localities, academicians in other specialties actively opposed the establishment of emergency medicine residency programs. They perceived physicians with inferior training intruding on their areas of practice and interfering with the training of their residents.
机译:帕特里克·普伦凯特(Patrick Plunkett)最近的社论“进化-一个缓慢而多变的过程”,使我非常感兴趣。他提到欧洲麻醉学家最近尝试开发作为麻醉学亚专业的急诊医学“核心课程”的尝试在美国30到40年前重复了类似的事件。布莱恩·辛克(Brian Zink)的一本非凡著作记载了美国急诊医学的历史,并简要介绍了与其他专业的冲突,这些专家认为自己“拥有”了全部或部分急诊医学。许多学术机构的课程通常面临管理“急诊室”的外科医生或内科医生的障碍。他们经常担任分诊代理人,在他们不熟悉的地区咨询其他初级保健服务。在许多地方,其他专业的院士积极反对建立急诊医学住院医师计划。他们认为医师的培训较差,干扰了他们的执业领域并干扰了其住院医师的培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号