首页> 外文期刊>European geriatric medicine. >Frailty, severity, progression and shared decision-making: A pragmatic framework for the challenge of clinical complexity at the end of life
【24h】

Frailty, severity, progression and shared decision-making: A pragmatic framework for the challenge of clinical complexity at the end of life

机译:虚弱,严重,进展和共同决策:生命终结时应对临床复杂性挑战的务实框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current epidemiological context features progressive ageing of the population and an increasing number of multi-morbid persons mostly affected by advanced chronic diseases. This perspective determines an urgency to improve decision-making, which becomes especially difficult due to the clinical uncertainty of life final stages. Usual approaches based on clinical practice guidelines and focused on the prognosis may be useful in a population approach, but will probably be insufficient against the clinical complexity arising from individualized decision-making. For this reason, we propose a pragmatic framework as a more comprehensive base to guide decision-making and helping the dialogue between patient, family and professionals in regards to expectations and objectives in the shared-decision process. This framework requires two stages: (1) an adequate situational diagnosis and (2) the build-up of shared decision-making contexts by involving patients in the process. To determine situational diagnosis, we propose a model that combines elements of background knowledge on geriatrics and palliative care, including the scientific evidence-(from prognostic markers and analysis of frailty based on the accumulation of deficits), and clinical experience (assessment of the variables taking into account both static-severity-and dynamic-progression-behaviour). For decision making, we incorporate the model of person-centred care based on shared decision-making, understood as a collaborative process between patients and professionals to identify needs, set objectives, develop and implement the care plan and monitor its evolution. Future studies will have to evaluate the validity and utility of this framework for decision making in elderly with advanced diseases at end-of-life. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS and European Union Geriatric Medicine Society. All rights reserved.
机译:当前的流行病学背景是人口的逐渐老龄化和越来越多的多病态人,这些人大多受到晚期慢性疾病的影响。这种观点确定了改善决策的紧迫性,由于生命最后阶段的临床不确定性,这变得尤其困难。基于临床实践指南并侧重于预后的常规方法可能在人群方法中有用,但可能不足以应对因个体化决策而引起的临床复杂性。因此,我们提出了一个务实的框架,作为更全面的基础,以指导决策制定并帮助患者,家庭和专业人员之间就共同决策过程中的期望和目标进行对话。该框架需要两个阶段:(1)适当的情境诊断;(2)通过让患者参与过程来建立共享的决策环境。为了确定情况诊断,我们提出了一个模型,该模型结合了老年医学和姑息治疗方面的背景知识要素,包括科学证据(来自预后指标和基于缺陷积累的脆弱性分析)和临床经验(变量评估)同时考虑到静态严重程度和动态进展行为)。对于决策,我们采用基于共同决策的以人为本的护理模型,该模型被理解为患者和专业人员之间的协作过程,用于识别需求,设定目标,制定和实施护理计划并监控其发展。未来的研究将必须评估该框架在生命晚期老年患者决策中的有效性和实用性。 (C)2015 Elsevier Masson SAS和欧盟老年医学学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号